O reilly's auto parts monticello indiana
UnexpectedOReilly
2019.02.15 04:52 UnexpectedOReilly
The subreddit for unexpected O'Reilly Auto Parts moments.
2019.06.29 04:51 _-Boredatwork-_ TeamOreilly
A space for fellow O'Reilly team members, and customers, to share stories, memes, jokes, or anything else related to O'Reilly Auto Parts.
2023.06.05 05:19 1NSON1A Sair com uma pessoa que ainda usa o grindr.
Pessoal seguinte tenho 20 anos e sou gay, conheci o D no grindr a mais o menos 1 mês, desde lá na nos encontramos 3x, para ficarmos.
Gostei muito de conhecer e sair com ele, mas nem tudo são flores, as vezes quando converso com ele percebo que já um certo desinteresse por parte dele ou até mesmo obrigação de responder só por educação(?), as vezes ele demora horas pra responder mesmo em dias que ele não está fazendo nada, por exemplo um domingo à noite ou um sábado qualquer, nessa última semana fiquei bolado com essa demora pra responder é acabei por ignorando a última mensagem dele e não se falamos até o último sábado, no qual eu tomei a iniciativa de chamar ele pra perguntar se tinha algo acontecendo.
Ele me respondeu e disse que estava cansado de só ele tomar iniciativa ou começar a conversa, eu sempre deixei claro que gosto de sair com ele e tals, mas eu pedi desculpas por isso sei que é chato ser o único a chamar ou puxar assunto deve ser bem frustrante, e desde então acho que estamos bem.
Agora sim, o que me incomoda, o fato dele continuar usando o grindr mesmo falando comigo, a demora em responder e o uso do grindr estão me fazendo questionar se eu não jogo tudo pro alto e foda-se, criei uma certa dependência emocional dele e isso está me fazendo muito mal, como posso abordar esse assunto com ele? estou sendo muito paranoico? como faço pra chegar e perguntar nele se ele tem alguma expectativa comigo? Isso está me consumindo por dentro, passei a semana inteira bem mal por conta disso, isso está afetando muito minha auto estima e confiança..
O que vocês fariam em minha posição? sério aceito qualquer conselho, ainda estou no grindr só pra ver se ele usa ainda, e acho isso completamente bizarro, mas não quero sair com alguém que está saindo com mais 10 pessoas.
submitted by
1NSON1A to
arco_iris [link] [comments]
2023.06.05 05:07 m3ntolado .campamento 6
El río no tenía agua. Era ancho como una calle y estaba lleno de piedras de muchos tamaños. La luna hacía brillar el suelo y nosotros nos sentíamos explorando otro planeta. Estirábamos los brazos y las piernas, y caminábamos como los astronautas de las películas.
Ramiro me contó el secreto para hacer torres de piedras. Las más grandes, con forma de huevo, iban en la parte de abajo y las más chicas arriba. Era un experto. Me dijo que su papá se lo había enseñado; que su papá sabía hacer un montón de cosas y que tenía más fuerza que un policía.
Plutón era muy gracioso, cada tanto se iba para un costado persiguiendo a los grillos. Se agachaba con las dos patitas de adelante juntas y movía la cola para prepararse, y daba manotazos.
Yo le mostré a Ramiro cómo tirar y hacer rebotar piedras. Le dije que lo más importante era el movimiento de la muñeca, como me había enseñado mi tío pablo, en un río con agua, en la casa de mis abuelos. Él era mi padrino y me había regalado al Tomy, un perrito que se había mudado al sur, al país de los perros, o algo así había dicho mi mamá.
Acomodamos las mochilas como almohadas y nos acostamos contra una piedra grande, con los brazos atrás de la cabeza, mirando las estrellas y buscando formas. Plutón caminó arriba de mi panza hasta mis piernas, dio un par de vueltas y se acostó cerca de mis rodillas.
Yo había visto en la tele que varias estrellas juntas formaban constelaciones y que tenían nombre, pero no me sabía ninguno, así que nos pusimos a inventar.
En un momento Ramiro se puso serio. Me dijo que allá arriba, en algún lugar de las estrellas, estaba la gente que se moría; que su papá estaba ahí, pero era tan lejos que nadie podía llegar. Yo no sabía que los papás y las mamás podían morirse, ese sí que era un asunto.
Me contó que su papá trabajaba mucho, y que un día se había quedado dormido mientras manejaba y que su auto se había salido de la ruta. Desde ese día su mamá casi no estaba en la casa y, cuando estaba, se la pasaba llorando en su pieza. Me dijo que creía que ella ya no quería ser su mamá, que a veces se olvidaba de buscarlo por el colegio.
Dijo que los papás y las mamás en un momento se cansaban de sus hijos.
Nos quedamos callados un rato largo. Creo que Ramiro se largó a llorar, pero yo no quería mirarlo, me daba vergüenza no saber qué decirle. Así que inventé una constelación nueva para levantarle el ánimo.
-Mirá, ese es el culo del profesor.
Él levantó la cabeza sin mirarme y sin hablar. Al rato dijo:
-Y ahí está la caca del caballo.
Nos largamos a reír y a mover las patas contra el suelo de la montaña gris.
Plutón dio un salto y se acomodó cerca de las mochilas.
submitted by
m3ntolado to
escribir [link] [comments]
2023.06.05 01:15 Interesting_Line_457 Spendere soldi
Banalmente, come spendete i vostri soldi e perché?
La maggior parte delle cose che compriamo o che facciamo sono evitabili e sono delle aggiunte alle cose essenziali che permettono letteralmente di sopravvivere (comprare acqua, cibo ecc..)
Quindi, quali sono le cose dal vostro punto di vista per cui vale la pena spendere soldi? Tecnologia nuova? Viaggi? Mangiare fuori? Comprare cibo di qualitá? Auto costosa?
submitted by
Interesting_Line_457 to
ItaliaPersonalFinance [link] [comments]
2023.06.05 00:10 BaseballBot Game of the Day 6/4 ⚾ Yankees (35-25) @ Dodgers (35-24) 7:10 PM ET
Yankees (35-25) @ Dodgers (35-24)
First Pitch: 7:10 PM at Dodger Stadium
Line Score - Game Over
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB |
NYY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
LAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
Box Score
NYY | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
Germán | 6.2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 99-71 | 3.69 |
Holmes | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 17-12 | 2.84 |
Peralta, Wa | 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18-9 | 2.84 |
Scoring Plays
Highlights
Description | Length | Video |
Bullpen availability for New York, June 4 vs Dodgers | 0:07 | Video |
Bullpen availability for Los Angeles, June 4 vs Yankees | 0:07 | Video |
Fielding alignment for New York, June 4 vs Dodgers | 0:11 | Video |
Starting lineups for Yankees at Dodgers - June 4, 2023 | 0:09 | Video |
Bobby Miller's outing against the Yankees | 0:22 | Video |
Breaking down Bobby Miller's pitches | 0:08 | Video |
Domingo Germán's outing against the Dodgers | 0:23 | Video |
Breaking down Domingo Germán's pitches | 0:08 | Video |
The distance behind J.D. Martinez's home run | 0:15 | Video |
The distance behind Anthony Volpe's home run | 0:14 | Video |
Decisions
Winning Pitcher | Losing Pitcher | Save |
Holmes (4-2, 2.84 ERA) | Phillips, E (1-1, 1.99 ERA) | Peralta, Wa (4 SV, 2.84 ERA) |
Attendance | Weather | Wind |
| 72°F, Partly Cloudy | 6 mph, Out To RF |
HP | 1B | 2B | 3B |
Ryan Blakney | Marvin Hudson | Hunter Wendelstedt | John Tumpane |
Game ended at 9:48 PM. Remember to
sort by new to keep up!
submitted by
BaseballBot to
baseball [link] [comments]
2023.06.05 00:10 DodgerBot Game Chat 6/4 - Yankees (35-25) @ Dodgers (35-24) 4:10 PM
Yankees (35-25) @ Dodgers (35-24)
First Pitch: 4:10 PM at Dodger Stadium
Line Score - Game Over
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB |
NYY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
LAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
Box Score
NYY | IP | H | R | ER | BB | SO | P-S | ERA |
Germán | 6.2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 99-71 | 3.69 |
Holmes | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 17-12 | 2.84 |
Peralta, Wa | 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 18-9 | 2.84 |
Scoring Plays
Highlights
Description | Length | Video |
Bullpen availability for New York, June 4 vs Dodgers | 0:07 | Video |
Bullpen availability for Los Angeles, June 4 vs Yankees | 0:07 | Video |
Fielding alignment for New York, June 4 vs Dodgers | 0:11 | Video |
Starting lineups for Yankees at Dodgers - June 4, 2023 | 0:09 | Video |
Bobby Miller's outing against the Yankees | 0:22 | Video |
Breaking down Bobby Miller's pitches | 0:08 | Video |
Domingo Germán's outing against the Dodgers | 0:23 | Video |
Breaking down Domingo Germán's pitches | 0:08 | Video |
The distance behind J.D. Martinez's home run | 0:15 | Video |
The distance behind Anthony Volpe's home run | 0:14 | Video |
Decisions
Winning Pitcher | Losing Pitcher | Save |
Holmes (4-2, 2.84 ERA) | Phillips, E (1-1, 1.99 ERA) | Peralta, Wa (4 SV, 2.84 ERA) |
Attendance | Weather | Wind |
| 72°F, Partly Cloudy | 6 mph, Out To RF |
HP | 1B | 2B | 3B |
Ryan Blakney | Marvin Hudson | Hunter Wendelstedt | John Tumpane |
Game ended at 6:48 PM. Remember to
sort by new to keep up!
submitted by
DodgerBot to
Dodgers [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 23:55 yehudin O casal cuckold/corno manso e a minha namorada
Tenho uma namorada há cerca de 2 anos. Não temos uma relação muito estável e profunda, oscila entre o namoro e a amizade colorida. Daí que não tenha propriamente grandes problemas em »dar uma mijadinha« fora do penico quando a oportunidade surge desde que seja feito com o necessário sigilo.
Frequento sites de sexo e há uns tempos atrás respondi a um anúncio colocado por um casal cuckold. Estavam nos seus 40 anos e o homem essencialmente queria ver outro homem a - pardon my french - comer a mulher dele em frente dele, sem que ele tivesse qualquer participação. Somente queria olhar. Trocamos diversas mensagens, combinamos um encontro e lá fui a casa deles.
Tive sexo com a mulher em casa deles. Depois das apresentações habituais, tiramos a roupa, ela começou a fazer-me sexo oral e depois prosseguimos para ter relações sexuais em várias posições. Como foi antes da minha cirurgia, naquela altura conseguia dar quatro quecas, com ejaculação, numa tarde, sem problemas de maior e foi o que aconteceu. Fizemos sexo oral um ao outro, fizemos 69, fizemos sexo vaginal e anal (ela auto-intitulava-se »prosélita do anal«, de tal forma que gostava dessa prática) e vim-me dentro dela e por cima dela. Fizemos tudo no sofá da sala deles. Enquanto tínhamos sexo, ela ia provocando o marido, dizendo-lhe »vês como é que se f*de uma mulher?« e coisas similares.
O que mais me chocou no meio disto tudo foi a reação do homem. Ele estava perfeitamente imperturbável com o que se estava a passar. Estava somente sentado num sofá no canto, a apreciar o espectáculo, a sorrir e sem se mostrar minimamente incomodado ou alegrado com o que se estava a passar. Era-lhe absolutamente indiferente um homem estar a comer a mulher dele, à frente dele, a pedido dele, em casa deles, sem qualquer reação - boa ou má - da parte dele. Reparei que tinha uma enormíssima segurança em si mesmo e na relação com a mulher e somente queria dar-lhe um prazerzinho de variar de vez em quando.
A minha namorada ainda me ligou enquanto estava em casa deles, disse-lhe que estava ocupado e à noite inventei uma desculpa (disse que tinha ido a casa de uns amigos por causa de um trabalho). Ela nunca soube de nada do que se passou.
Ainda chegamos a ter sexo mais duas vezes e entretanto o casal desapareceu da minha vida.
Confesso que fiquei com uma certa inveja da imperturbabilidade dele enquanto eu lhe comia a mulher. Quanta segurança é preciso ter em si para não reagir perante uma coisa destas? Aquilo ficou-me a martelar na cabeça e não consigo tirar aquilo da minha mente. Comecei a frequentar sites cuckold e a interessar-me por este estilo de vida.
Entretanto desenvolveu-se uma fantasia na minha cabeça. Como a minha namorada é um bocadinho racista (refere-se depreciativamente aos cidadãos de etnia africana como »béléuléus«, o que me irrita solenemente) , ando a fantasiar em vê-la a ter sexo com um daqueles negros fortes e com uma pila enorme. Teria mesmo que ser negro e particularmente dotado no membro viril. Já me masturbei imensas vezes a pensar nisso e não consigo tirar essa ideia da cabeça.
Será castigo por causa daquilo que fiz?
submitted by
yehudin to
CasualPT [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 23:41 Danthedude1 Ultimate ERB Poll results
Hey again, it's me, the guy who did that big poll 2 weeks back. I finally stopped procrastinating and compiled the results here (I meant to post this like a week ago, when the responses slowed down).
Anyway, thanks for the support on this! I got 90 responses, and the poll did much better than I thought it would. Here's the results:
(Below, the text in bold are the results, and the normal text are my comments. All percentages are calculated without the "Haven't watched" responses included, while the haven't watched percentages themselves are calculated with all votes counted. Remember that every question was required, so all questions had 90-91 votes). Hopefully my explanation isn't too terrible. If a percentage has a tilde (~) in front of it, the percent was rounded up to the nearest tenth.
John Lennon vs. Bill O'Reilly - - John Lennon: 45 votes (62.5%)
- - Bill O'Reilly: 27 votes (37.5%)
- - Total: 72 votes
- - Haven't watched: 18 votes (20%)
Darth Vader vs. Adolf Hitler - - Darth Vader: 57 votes (~64%)
- - Adolf Hitler: 32 votes (~36%)
- - Total: 89 votes
- - Haven't watched: 1 vote (1.1%)
Only one person said they didn't watch it. I checked the responses and the person who said that responded HW for 50% of the battles, so that's why. Not calling them out or anything, just thought you might be wondering
Abe Lincoln vs. Chuck Norris - - Abe Lincoln: 57 votes (~71.9%)
- - Chuck
fucking Norris: 32 votes (~28.1%) - - Total: 82 votes
- - Haven't watched: 8 votes (8.9%)
Sarah Palin vs. Lady Gaga - - Sarah Palin: 8 votes (~10.9%)
- - Lady Gaga: 66 votes (~89.1%)
- - Total: 74 votes
- - Haven't watched: 16 votes (17.8%)
Hulk Hogan and Macho Man vs. Kim Jong-Il - - HH + MM: 62 votes (~79.5%)
- - Kim Jong-Il: 16 votes (~20.5%)
- - Total: 78 votes
- - Haven't watched: 12 votes (13.3%)
Justin Bieber vs. Beethoven: - - Justin Bieber: 2 votes (~2.4%)
- - Beethoven: 81 votes (~97.6%)
- - Total: 83 votes
- - Haven't watched: 7 votes (7.8%)
With a percentage of 97.6%, Beethoven has the biggest slam dunk out of every battle on this list.
Albert Einstein vs. Stephen Hawking - - Albert Einstein: 40 votes (~46.5%)
- - Stephen Hawking: 46 votes (~53.5%)
- - Total: 86 votes
- - Haven't watched: 4 votes (4.4%)
Genghis Khan vs. Easter Bunny - - Genghis Khan: 55 votes (~69.6%)
- - Easter Bunny: 24 votes (~30.4%)
- - Total: 79 votes
- - Haven't watched: 11 votes (4.4%)
Napoleon vs. Napoleon - - Bonaparte: 64 votes (80%)
- - Dynamite: 16 votes (20%)
- - Total: 80 votes
- - Haven't watched: 10 votes (11.1%)
Okay so at this point someone decided to submit a vote, so the results above are off by one vote. I'm not wasting my time changing it.
Billy Mays vs. Ben Franklin - - Billy Mays: 13 votes (~15.9%)
- - Ben Franklin: 31 votes (~37.8%)
- - Vince Offer: 38 votes (~46.3%)
- - Total: 82 votes
- - Haven't watched: 9 votes (9.9%)
Gandalf vs. Dumbledore - - Gandalf: 24 votes (~35.8%)
- - Dumbledore: 43 votes (~64.2%)
- - Total: 67 votes
- - Haven't watched: 24 votes (26.4%)
I believe this is the least watched battle. Apparently, more than 1/4 of this subreddit has not watched this battle
Dr. Seuss vs. Shakespeare - - Dr. Seuss, Cat in the Hat, Thing 1 and 2: 12 votes (~13.8%)
- - Shakespeare: 75 votes (~86.2%)
- - Total: 87 votes
- - Haven't watched: 4 votes (4.4%)
I'm assuming that Thing 1 and 2 drag down the team a lot.
Mr. T vs. Mr. Rogers - - Mr. T: 8 votes (~9.9%)
- - Mr. Rogers: 73 votes (~90.1%)
- - Total: 81 votes
- - Haven't watched: 10 votes (11%)
Christopher Columbus vs. Captain Kirk - - Christopher Columbus: 31 votes (~39.2%)
- - Captain Kirk: 48 votes (~60.8%)
- - Total: 79 votes
- - Haven't watched: 12 votes (13.2%)
NicePeter vs. EpicLLOYD - - Nice Peter: 27 votes (~38%)
- - EpicLLOYD: 44 votes (~62%)
- - Total: 71 votes
- - Haven't watched: 20 votes (22%)
Hitler vs. Vader 2 - - Hitler: 63 votes (~70.8%)
- - Vader: 48 votes (~29.2%)
- - Total: 89 votes
- - Haven't watched: 2 votes (2.2%)
Master Chief vs. Leonidas - - Master Chief: 59 votes (~75.6%)
- - Leonidas: 48 votes (~24.4%)
- - Total: 78 votes
- - Haven't watched: 13 votes (14.3%)
Mario Bros vs. Wright Bros - - Mario Bros: 27 votes (~31.8%)
- - Wright Bros: 58 votes (~68.2%)
- - Total: 85 votes
- - Haven't watched: 6 votes (6.6%)
Michael Jackson vs. Elvis Presley - - Michael Jackson: 54 votes (~61.4%)
- - Elvis Presley: 34 votes (~38.6%)
- - Total: 88 votes
- - Haven't watched: 3 votes (3.3%)
Cleopatra vs. Marilyn Monroe - - Cleopatra: 76 votes (~92.7%)
- - Marilyn Monroe: 9 votes (~7.3%)
- - Total: 85 votes
- - Haven't watched: 6 votes (6.6%)
Steve Jobs vs. Bill Gates - - Steve Jobs: 30 votes (~33.7%)
- - Bill Gates: 36 votes (~40.4%)
- - HAL 9000: 23 votes (~25.9%)
- - Total: 89 votes
- - Haven't watched: 2 votes (2.2%)
This is the most balanced 1v1+1 battle. Kind of surprised that HAL got so many votes, I initially believed that people didn't like that part of the battle.
Frank Sinatra vs. Freddie Mercury - - Frank Sinatra: 13 votes (~15.3%)
- - Freddie Mercury: 72 votes (~64.7%)
- - Total: 85 votes
- - Haven't watched: 6 votes (6.6%)
Barack Obama vs. Mitt Romney - - Barack Obama: 84 votes (~92.3%)
- - Mitt Romney: 7 votes (~7.7%)
- - Total: 91 votes
- - Haven't watched: 0 votes (0%)
This is the only battle in which everyone stated they had watched it. Makes sense, it is ERB's most viewed video
Doc Brown vs. Doctor Who - - Doc Brown: 26 votes (~33.8%)
- - The Doctor(s): 51 votes (~66.2%)
- - Total: 77 votes
- - Haven't watched: 14 votes (15.4%)
Bruce Lee vs. Clint Eastwood - - Bruce Lee: 9 votes (~11%)
- - Clint Eastwood: 73 votes (~89%)
- - Total: 82 votes
- - Haven't watched: 9 votes (9.9%)
Batman vs. Sherlock Holmes - - Batman + Robin: 6 votes (~6.9%)
- - Sherlock + Watson: 73 votes (~93.1%)
- - Total: 87 votes
- - Haven't watched: 7 votes (7.7%)
I bet Robin would've done better if he were a standalone option.
Moses vs. Santa Claus - - Moses: 67 votes (~81.7%)
- - Santa Claus: 15 votes (~18.3%)
- - Total: 82 votes
- - Haven't watched: 9 votes (9.9%)
Adam vs. Eve - - Adam: 25 votes (~34.7%)
- - Eve: 47 votes (~65.3%)
- - Total: 72 votes
- - Haven't watched: 19 votes (20.9%)
Gandhi vs. Martin Luther King Jr - - Gandhi: 51 votes (~58.6%)
- - Martin Luther King Jr: 36 votes (~41.4%)
- - Total: 87 votes
- - Haven't watched: 4 votes (4.4%)
Nikola Tesla vs. Thomas Edison - - Nikola Tesla: 69 votes (~83.1%)
- - Thomas Edison: 14 votes (~16.9%)
- - Total: 83 votes
- - Haven't watched: 8 votes (8.8%)
Babe Ruth vs. Lance Armstrong - - Babe Ruth: 78 votes (~94%)
- - Lance Armstrong: 5 votes (~6%)
- - Total: 83 votes
- - Haven't watched: 8 votes (8.8%)
Mozart vs. Skrillex - - Mozart: 71 votes (~80.7%)
- - Skrillex: 17 votes (~19.3%)
- - Total: 88 votes
- - Haven't watched: 3 votes (3.3%)
Rasputin vs. Stalin - - Rasputin: 1 vote (~1.1%)
- - Stalin: 12 votes (~13.5%)
- - Lenin: 30 votes (~33.7%)
- - Gorbachev: 39 votes (~43.8%)
- - Putin: 7 votes (~7.9%)
- - Total: 89 votes
- - Haven't watched: 2 votes (2.2%)
This one. Actually suprised to see Lenin so high, I've never really seen anyone talk about his verse.
Hitler vs. Vader 3 - - Darth Vader + Boba Fett: 80 votes (~90.9%)
- - Adolf Hitler: 8 votes (~9.1%)
- - Total: 88 votes
- - Haven't watched: 3 votes (3.3%)
With the trilogy complete, Darth Vader wins best of three 2-1.
Blackbeard vs. Al Capone - - Blackbeard: 20 votes (~24.7%)
- - Al Capone: 61 votes (~75.3%)
- - Total: 81 votes
- - Haven't watched: 10 votes (11%)
Miley Cyrus vs. Joan of Arc - - Miley Cyrus: 6 votes (8%)
- - Joan of Arc: 69 votes (92%)
- - Total: 75 votes
- - Haven't watched: 16 votes (17.6%)
Bob Ross vs. Pablo Picasso - - Bob Ross: 54 votes (~65.8%)
- - Pablo Picasso: 28 votes (~34.2%)
- - Total: 82 votes
- - Haven't watched: 9 votes (9.9%)
Michael Jordan vs. Muhammed Ali - - Michael Jordan: 24 votes (~29.6%)
- - Muhammed Ali: 57 votes (~70.4%)
- - Total: 81 votes
- - Haven't watched: 10 votes (11%)
Donald Trump vs. Ebeneezer Scrooge - - Donald Trump: 2 votes (~2.5%)
- - Ebeneezer Scrooge: 57 votes (~26.6%)
- - J.P Morgan: 32 votes (~40.5%)
- - Kanye West: 9 votes (~11.4%)
- - Death: 15 votes (~19%)
- - Total: 79 votes
- - Haven't watched: 12 votes (13.2%)
This one is weird. Meta-battles cause problems for polls because, well, do you need a winner for a story? I considered leaving this one out, and I also considered all the ghosts being put on one team, but I really just see these results as "Who had the best verse?", over who won the battle.
Rick Grimes vs. Walter White - - Rick Grimes: 9 votes (~10.3%)
- - Pablo Picasso: 57 votes (~89.7%)
- - Total: 87 votes
- - Haven't watched: 4 votes (4.4%)
Goku vs. Superman - - Goku: 67 votes (~81.7%)
- - Superman: 15 votes (~18.3%)
- - Total: 82 votes
- - Haven't watched: 9 votes (4.4%)
Stephen King vs. Edgar Allen Poe - - Stephen King: 58 votes (~69.9%)
- - Edgar Allen Poe: 25 votes (~30.1%)
- - Total: 83 votes
- - Haven't watched: 8 votes (8.8%)
Sir Isaac Newton vs. Bill Nye - - Sir Isaac Newton: 67 votes (~75.3%)
- - Bill Nye + Neil DeGrasse Tyson: 22 votes (~24.7%)
- - Total: 89 votes
- - Haven't watched: 2 votes (2.2%)
George Washington vs. William Wallace - - George Washington: 29 votes (~36.7%)
- - William Wallace: 50 votes (~63.3%)
- - Total: 79 votes
- - Haven't watched: 12 votes (13.2%)
Artists vs. TMNT - - Artists: 78 votes (~91.8%)
- - TMNT: 7 votes (~8.2%)
- - Total: 85 votes
- - Haven't watched: 6 votes (6.6%)
Ghostbusters vs. Mythbusters - - Ghostbusters: 18 votes (~22%)
- - Mythbusters + B-Team: 47 votes (~57.3%)
- - Stay Puft Marshmellow Man: 17 votes (~20.7%)
- - Total: 82 votes
- - Haven't watched: 9 votes (9.9%)
Romeo and Juliet vs. Bonnie and Clyde - - Romeo and Juliet: 61 votes (~72.6%)
- - Bonnie and Clyde: 23 votes (~27.4%)
- - Total: 84 votes
- - Haven't watched: 7 votes (7.7%)
Zeus vs. Thor - - Zeus: 7 votes (~9.7%)
- - Thor: 65 votes (~90.3%)
- - Total: 72 votes
- - Haven't watched: 19 votes (20.9%)
Jack the Ripper vs. Hannibal Lecter - - Jack the Ripper: 14 votes (~16.3%)
- - Hannibal Lecter: 72 votes (~83.7%)
- - Total: 86 votes
- - Haven't watched: 5 votes (5.5%)
Oprah Winfrey vs. Ellen DeGeneres - - Oprah Winfrey: 55 votes (~78.6%)
- - Ellen DeGeneres: 15 votes (~21.4%)
- - Total: 70 votes
- - Haven't watched: 21 votes (23.1%)
Steven Spielberg vs. Alfred Hitchcock - - Steven Spielberg: 4 votes (~4.8%)
- - Alfred Hitchcock: 15 votes (~17.9%)
- - Quentin Tarantino: 37 votes (~44%)
- - Stanley Kubrick: 9 votes (~10.7%)
- - Michael Bay: 19 votes (~22.6%)
- - Total: 84 votes
- - Haven't watched: 7 votes (7.7%)
Lewis and Clark vs. Bill and Ted - - Lewis and Clark: 47 votes (~65.3%)
- - Bill and Ted: 25 votes (~34.7%)
- - Total: 72 votes
- - Haven't watched: 19 votes (20.9%)
David Copperfield vs. Harry Houdini - - David Copperfield: 36 votes (~51.4%)
- - Harry Houdini: 34 votes (~48.6%)
- - Total: 70 votes
- - Haven't watched: 21 votes (23.1%)
I'm not sure, but I'm pretty sure this is the most balanced battle. Nvm, there's a closer one.
Terminator vs. Robocop - - Terminator: 56 votes (70%)
- - RoboCop: 24 votes (30%)
- - Total: 80 votes
- - Haven't watched: 11 votes (12.1%)
Alright, we're moving onto East vs. West Philosophers. In the poll, I split it into two categories: teams and individual.
Eastern Philosophers vs. Western Philosophers (Team) - - Eastern Philosophers: 41 votes (~47.1%)
- - Western Philosophers: 46 votes (~52.9%)
- - Total: 87 votes
- - Haven't watched: 4 votes (4.4%)
Eastern Philosophers vs. Western Philosophers (Solo) - - Nietzsche: 25 votes (~29.1%)
- - Socrates: 11 votes (~12.8%)
- - Voltaire: 15 votes (~17.4%)
- - Lao Tzu: 1 votes (~1.2%)
- - Sun Tzu: 11 votes (~12.8%)
- - Confucius: 23 votes (~26.7)
- - Total: 86 votes
- - Haven't watched: 5 votes (5.5%)
So yeah, the Western Philosophers barely scrape the win both times. Also, an attentive reader will notice that the first part has 4 "Haven't watched" votes, while the other one has 5. Someone did the poll wrong.
Shaka Zulu vs. Julius Caesar - - Shaka Zulu: 8 votes (~9.6%)
- - Julius Caesar: 75 votes (~90.4%)
- - Total: 83 votes
- - Haven't watched: 8 votes (8.8%)
Jim Henson vs. Stan Lee - - Jim Henson (and Kermit): 14 votes (~16.9%)
- - Stan Lee: 21 votes (~25.3%)
- - Walt Disney: 50 votes (~57.8%)
- - Total: 85 votes
- - Haven't watched: 5* (6) votes (5.6%* (6.6%))
You might have noticed the weird haven't watched thing. It turns out, I accidentally left that question unrequired, so someone skipped the question, leaving it with only 90 responses. Due to the fact someone skipped, I assume they haven't watched.
Deadpool vs. Boba Fett - - Deadpool: 40 votes (~47.6%)
- - Boba Fett: 44 votes (~52.4%)
- - Total: 84 votes
- - Haven't watched: 7 votes (7.7%)
J. R. R. Tolkien vs. George R. R. Martin - - J. R. R. Tolkien: 70 votes (~85.4%)
- - George R. R. Martin: 12 votes (~14.6%)
- - Total: 82 votes
- - Haven't watched: 9 votes (9.9%)
Gordon Ramsey vs. Julia Child - - Gordon Ramsey: 44 votes (~51.2%)
- - Julia Child: 42 votes (~48.8%)
- - Total: 86 votes
- - Haven't watched: 5 votes (5.5%)
Frederick Douglass vs. Thomas Jefferson - - Frederick Douglass: 66 votes (~81.5%)
- - Thomas Jefferson: 15 votes (~18.5%)
- - Total: 81 votes
- - Haven't watched: 10 votes (11%)
James Bond vs. Austin Powers - - James Bond (Daniel Craig): 26 votes (~30.2%)
- - Austin Powers: 41 votes (~46.5%)
- - James Bond (Sean Connery): 20 votes (~23.3%)
- - Total: 86 votes
- - Haven't watched: 4 votes (4.4%)
Bruce Banner vs. Bruce Jenner - - Bruce BanneThe Hulk: 62 votes (~86.1%)
- - Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner: 10 votes (~13.9%)
- - Total: 72 votes
- - Haven't watched: 19 votes (20.9%)
Alexander the Great vs. Ivan the Terrible - - Alexander the Great: 22 votes (25%)
- - Ivan the Terrible: 3 votes (~3.4%)
- - Frederick the Great: 36 votes (~40.9%)
- - Pompey the Great: 11 votes (12.5%)
- - Catherine the Great: 16 votes (~18.2%)
- - Total: 88 votes
- - Haven't watched: 3 votes (20.9%)
Well, let's talk about Pompey. At the start, Pompey was leading the poll, however people seemed to vote normally after that. I have my reasons for including him (aka it was funny), though you might disagree and that's totally fine. I would probably upset more people if I excluded him in any case.
Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton - - Donald Trump: 74 votes (~82.2%)
- - Hillary Clinton: 16 votes (~17.8%)
- - Total: 90 votes
- - Haven't watched: 1 votes (1.1%)
Ash Ketchum vs. Charles Darwin - - Ash Ketchum: 33 votes (~38.8%)
- - Charles Darwin: 52 votes (~61.2%)
- - Total: 85 votes
- - Haven't watched: 6 votes (6.6%)
Wonder Woman vs. Stevie Wonder - - Wonder Woman: 6 votes (~7.1%)
- - Stevie Wonder: 78 votes (~92.9%)
- - Total: 84 votes
- - Haven't watched: 7 votes (7.7%)
Tony Hawk vs. Wayne Gretsky - - Tony Hawk: 10 votes (~12%)
- - Wayne Gretsky: 73 votes (~88%)
- - Total: 83 votes
- - Haven't watched: 8 votes (8.8%)
Theodore Roosevelt vs. Winston Churchill - - Theodore Roosevelt: 75 votes (~84.3%)
- - Winston Churchill: 14 votes (~15.7%)
- - Total: 89 votes
- - Haven't watched: 2 votes (2.2%)
Nice Peter vs. EpicLLOYD 2 - - Nice Peter: 19 votes (~26.4%)
- - EpicLLOYD: 53 votes (~73.6%)
- - Total: 72 votes
- - Haven't watched: 19 votes (20.9%)
This means that EpicLLOYD has won both times.
Elon Musk vs. Mark Zuckerberg - - Elon Musk: 35 votes (~41.7%)
- - Mark Zuckerberg: 49 votes (~58.3%)
- - Total: 84 votes
- - Haven't watched: 7 votes (7.7%)
Freddy Krueger vs. Wolverine - - Freddy Krueger: 5 votes (~6.8%)
- - Wolverine: 69 votes (~93.2%)
- - Total: 74 votes
- - Haven't watched: 17 votes (18.7%)
Guy Fawkes vs. Che Guevara - - Guy Fawkes: 43 votes (~51.8%)
- - Che Guevara: 40 votes (~48.2%)
- - Total: 83 votes
- - Haven't watched: 8 votes (8.8%)
Ronald McDonald vs. The Burger King - - Ronald McDonald: 18 votes (~21.2%)
- - The Burger King: 43 votes (~50.6%)
- - Wendy: 24 votes (~28.2%)
- - Total: 85 votes
- Haven't watched: 6 votes (6.6%) George Carlin vs. Richard Pryor - - George Carlin: 4 votes (~5.2%)
- - Richard Pryor: 2 votes (~2.6%)
- - Bill Cosby: 5 votes (~6.5%)
- - Joan Rivers: 37 votes (~48.1%)
- - Robin Williams: 29 votes (~37.6%)
- - Total: 77 votes
- - Haven't watched: 14 votes (15.4%)
Once again, I included Bill Cosby for the same reason as Pompey. Cosby did better than 2 people, but none of them did very well anyway. This battle was mostly in contention between Rivers and Williams
Jacques Cousteau vs. Steve Irwin - - Jacques Cousteau: 14 votes (~17.1%)
- - Steve Irwin: 68 votes (~82.9%)
- - Total: 82 votes
- - Haven't watched: 9 votes (9.9%)
Mother Teresa vs. Sigmund Freud - - Mother Teresa: 18 votes (~21.2%)
- - Sigmund Freud: 67 votes (~78.8%)
- - Total: 85 votes
- - Haven't watched: 6 votes (6.6%)
Vlad the Impaler vs. Count Dracula - - Vlad the Impaler: 66 votes (~85.7%)
- - Count Dracula: 11 votes (~14.3%)
- - Total: 77 votes
- - Haven't watched: 14 votes (15.4%)
The Joker vs. Pennywise - - The Joker: 58 votes (~68.2%)
- - Pennywise: 27 votes (~31.8%)
- - Total: 85 votes
- - Haven't watched: 6 votes (6.6%)
Thanos vs. J. Robert Oppenheimer - - Thanos: 6 votes (~6.4%)
- - J. Robert Oppenheimer: 83 votes (~93.6%)
- - Total: 89 votes
- - Haven't watched: 2 votes (2.2%)
Donald Trump vs. Joe Biden - - Donald Trump: 14 votes (~15.9%)
- - Joe Biden: 74 votes (~84.1%)
- - Total: 88 votes
- - Haven't watched: 3 votes (3.3%)
With that, all 3 election battles had the "winner" be the actual winner of the election. Curious.
Harry Potter vs. Luke Skywalker - - Harry Potter: 39 votes (~45.9%)
- - Luke Skywalker: 46 votes (~54.1%)
- - Total: 85 votes
- - Haven't watched: 6 votes (6.6%)
Ragnar Lodbrok vs. Richard the Lionheart - - Ragnar Lodbrok: 52 votes (~73.2%)
- - Richard the Lionheart: 19 votes (~26.8%)
- - Total: 71 votes
- - Haven't watched: 20 votes (22%)
Jeff Bezos vs. Mansa Musa - - Jeff Bezos: 4 votes (~4.8%)
- - Mansa Musa: 80 votes (~95.2%)
- - Total: 84 votes
- - Haven't watched: 7 votes (7.7%)
John Wick vs. John Rambo vs. John McClane - - John Wick: 43 votes (~51.2%)
- - John Rambo: 4 votes (~4.8%)
- - John McClane: 37 votes (~44%)
- - Total: 84 votes
- - Haven't watched: 7 votes (7.7%)
Lara Croft vs. Indiana Jones - - Lara Croft: 51 votes (60%)
- - Indiana Jones: 34 votes (40%)
- - Total: 85 votes
- - Haven't watched: 6 votes (6.6%)
And that's it. If you made it down here, congrats, you just absorbed a bunch of useless info. Thank you for taking the time to read. I might do something like this again in the future, with opinions on things other than the winners of the battles (things like best battle, season, rapper). But not for a while, considering how long it took to compile this data. Anyways, that's my time, gotta set myself free.
submitted by
Danthedude1 to
ERB [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 23:00 NokCha_ [Official] r/warriors Dubs Draft Primer
warriors 2023 Dubs Draft Primer
This will be the primer for
warriors on everything draft related. Once the draft is done, another version focusing more on the offseason will come out. Until then, here is the aggregated version of a mostly draft-focused primer (with a few other stuff added).
2023 NBA Draft Date: Thursday June 22, 2023
Confirmed Draft Workouts (Last Updated: 6/3)
Reminder: These workouts aren't just for the 19th pick. It's for the possible undrafted players to recruit for the Summer League, Training Camp, Two-way spots, and/or Santa Cruz Warriors (Warriors' G-league). In case you forget and came to complain about working out guards or the fact they are working out prospects at all.
*Dropped out of the draft/Returned to School/Team/Org
Mock Drafts for 19th (Last Updated: 6/3)
Publication/Individual Source | Date of Mock Draft | | Age | Height - Position | School/Team/Org | Brief Summary of Reason | Add'l Notes |
The Athletic (Sam Vecenie) [PAYWALL] | 5/16 | Jalen Hood-Schifino | 20 | 6'6 - Wing | Indiana | 1. Warriors like well-rounded propsects 2. Team tends to draft younger recently 3. Ballhandling depth (esp if Poole is traded) | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. Due to paywall here is the 3 picks ahead + 3 picks behind 19th: 16)Kris Murray; 17)Jordan Hawkins; 18)Keyonte George; 20)Dariq Whitehead; 21)Brice Sensabaugh; 22)Jett Howard |
ESPN/Draft Express (Jonathan Givony & Jeremy Woo) [PAYWALL] | 5/31 | Rayan Rupert | 19 | 6'7 - Wing | New Zeland Breakers | Rupert targeting playoff contenders > draft positions. Defensive-minded prospect w 7'2 wingspan+high intensity could help the Warriors who needed stops during the playoffs | Post-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. Due to paywall here is the 3 picks ahead + 3 picks behind 19th: 16)Kobe Bufkin; 17)Cason Wallace; 18)Jett Howard; 20)Noah Clownley; 21)Bilal Coulibaly; 22)Leonard Miller |
The Ringer (Kevin O'Connor) | 5/16 | Dereck Lively II | 19 | 7'1- Big | Duke | 2nd try at drafting a young big * Defense, Rebounding shown * Steph could unlock the offensive side | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
Bleacher Report (Jonathan Wasserman) | 6/2 | Jett Howard | 19 | 6'8 - Wing | Michigan | Wing depth w shooting versatility + occasional self-creation. Questions about athleticism + defense | Post-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
Yahoo! Sports (Krysten Peek) | 5/16 | Dereck Lively II | 19 | 7'1- Big | Duke | Nothing Dubs specific - Shot blocker + Rebounder that can contribute right away | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
SB Nation (Ricky O'Donnell) | 5/16 | Leonard Miller | 19 | 6'10 - Forward | G League Ignite | Nothing Dubs specific - Upside. Good touch around basket. Defensive versatility (when locked in). | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
Sports Illustrated (Matt Babcock) | 5/23 | Kris Murray | 22 | 6'8 - Wing | Iowa | Nothing Dubs specific - Scorer. Offensive board getter. Stretch 4. Solid and safe. | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
NBC Sports( Chas Hughes & Tyler Byrum) | 5/27 | Jalen Hood-Schifino | 20 | 6'6 - Wing | Indiana | Nothing Warriors specific - Big guard that penetrate paint and facilitate. | Post-combine/pro days + Pre-NCAA returners announced. |
CBS Sports (Gary Parrish) | 5/22 | Dereck Lively II | 19 | 7'1- Big | Duke | Nothing Dubs specific - Rim protecting big | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
CBS Sports (Kyle Boone) | 5/26 | Trey Alexander* | 20 | 6'3 - Guard/Wing | Creighton | Nothing Dubs specific - Improved stock after combine. Evolved from athletic wing => playmaking guard. Two-way potential | *Has returned to college since |
Fox Sports (John Fanta) | 5/18 | Kobe Bufkin | 19 | 6'4 - Guard | Michigan | Adds depth and athleticism. 2-way talent. Describes a better Jordan Poole. | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
USA Today (Lindsay Schnel, Cydney Henderson, Jeff Zillgitt) | 5/17 | Rayan Rupert | 19 | 6'7 - Wing | New Zeland Breakers | Nothing Dubs specific - Solid year in the pro league + 7'3 wingspan | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
USA Today FTW (Bryan Kalbrosky) | 5/16 | Dereck Lively II | 19 | 7'1- Big | Duke | Nothing Dubs specific | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
Rookie Wire FTW (Cody Taylor) | 6/2 | Jett Howard | 19 | 6'8 - Wing | Michigan | Warriors could use more shooting + shown he can do more than just shoot | Post-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
Yardbarker (Pat Heery) | 5/31 | Dereck Lively II | 19 | 7'1- Big | Duke | 2nd try at drafting a young big. Trade asset. | Post-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
The Sporting News (Kyle Irving) | 5/17 | Brice Sensabaugh | 19 | 6'6 - Wing | Ohio State | More perimeter shooting around Steph & Klay. Excel as a floor spacer. Might not be an immediate contributor, but can be a scoring depth for the 2nd unit | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
Box and One (Adam Spinella/Coach Spins) | 6/2 | Dariq Whitehead | 18 | 6'6 - Wing | Duke | Warriors need more wings who can play offball. Notes Whitehead has high school pedigree which is something Warriors have valued (Nico Mannion, PBJ, etc) | Post-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
No Ceilings | 5/17 | Gradey Dick | 19 | 6'8 - Wing | Kansas | Really good system fit + Adds another theoretically reliable shooter. Also only mock draft that has Gradey Dick falling down this far so doubt this one. | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
@MavsDraft (Richard Stayman) | 5/19 | Brice Sensabaugh | 19 | 6'6 - Wing | Ohio State | - | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
Tankathon | 6/1 | Dereck Lively II | 19 | 7'1- Big | Duke | - | Post-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
NBAdraft.net | 5/31 | Dereck Lively II | 19 | 7'1- Big | Duke | - | Post-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
NBA Draft Room | 6/3 | Brice Sensabaugh | 19 | 6'6 - Wing | Ohio State | Nothing Dubs specific - Powerful wing with an advanced offensive game | Post-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
u/nghbrhd_slackr87's Optimistic Pick | 5/18 | Jaime Jaquez Jr | 22 | 6'7 - Guard | UCLA | Read it Here | Pre-combine/pro days + NCAA returners announced. |
Draft Picks (Source)
Year | Round | Owns | Owed |
2023 | 1 | ✔ | - |
2023 | 2 | ❌ | CLE |
2024 | 1 | ❔ (If Top 4) | MEM (If 5-30) |
2024 | 2 | ❌ | HOU or CLE |
2025 | 1 | ❔ (If 2024 conveys OR keeps 2024 + Top 1) | MEM (If 2024 is Top 4 AND 2-30) |
2025 | 2 | ❌ | DET or WAS |
2025 | 2 | ❔ (From CHA If 56-60) | - |
2026 | 1 | ❔ (If 2025 conveys) | MEM (If 2024 ends up Top 4 AND 2025 ends up Top 1) |
2026 | 2 | ❌ | ATL |
2027 | 1 | ✔ | - |
2027 | 2 | ✔ | - |
2028 | 1 | ✔ | - |
2028 | 2 | ❌ | POR |
2029 | 1 | ✔ | - |
2029 | 2 | ✔ | - |
2030 | 1 | ✔ | - |
2030 | 2 | ✔ | - |
News Reporting
Changing of the GM:
- Wojnarowski - 5/30: "Golden State's GM Bob Myers is stepping down as the franchise's president and general manager. With Myers' departure, Warriors owner Joe Lacob is expected to seek more prominent roles for his son, Kirk, an executive vice president of basketball operations, and VP of basketball operations Mike Dunleavy Jr."
- Slater - 5/31: "Warriors actually had a pre-draft workout while Myers and Lacob were doing their Tuesday afternoon press conference. It included Jaime Jaquez Jr., the UCLA wing who is an option for them with the 19th pick. Larry Harris, their long-time leader of college scouting, and Mike Dunleavy Jr., the presumed successor to Myers, ran it."
- Steinmetz - 6/2: "According to my sources, Mike Dunleavy Jr. is going to be the next General Manager of the Golden State Warriors. If the money is right, Dunleavy is going to be the guy."
Kenny Atkinson:
- Stein - 6/3: "Kenny Atkinson recently interviewed in Toronto for the Raptors' coaching vacancy, league sources say."
Draymond Green & Klay Thompson Extensions:
- Slater&Charania - 5/12: "Warriors intend to discuss a new multi-year contract with Green, either via an opt in and extend or an entirely new deal after an opt out, sources briefed on the matter tell The Athletic. Green has leverage: He is expected to have multiple playoff-contending teams in pursuit if he enters the open market"
- Wojnarowski - 4/16: "[Klay] Thompson, I'm told, has an expectation that he would be rewarded with a new, max-level contract extension this offseason"
- Slater&Charania - 5/12: "Thompson is extension eligible this summer. He’s making $43.2 million on the final year of his deal next season. If he’s to extend with the Warriors this summer, the expectation is he’d have to accept a paycut, as Andrew Wiggins did last summer"
Jonathan Kuminga's Future:
- Slater&Charania - 5/12: "The Warriors and Kuminga’s representatives are expected to discuss his future this offseason, league sources say. Golden State will need to decide whether Kuminga will receive a full-time role moving forward, and, if not, league sources say the No. 7 pick in the 2021 NBA Draft will want to be somewhere he can play more."
- Dumas - 5/13: "I’m told Jonathan Kuminga aims to split his off-season time in Miami, NYC, and LA. He wants to participate in alot of NBA open runs and showcase to people around the league what he can do on the court."
Players
Guaranteed to be on Next Year's Roster & Salary (Source):
Player | 2023-24 Salary | Notes | Contract End Date(s) |
Steph Curry | $51.9 mil | Vet Ext (Supermax)/Bird | 2026 (UFA) |
Klay Thompson | $43.2 mil | FA (Max)/Bird | 2024 (UFA) |
Jordan Poole | $27.4 mil | Rookie Ext/Bird | 2027 (UFA) |
Andrew Wiggins | $24.3 mil | Vet Ext/Bird | 2026 (PO) / 2027 (UFA) |
Gary Payton II | $8.7 mil | Acquired via Trade | 2025(PO) / 2025(UFA) |
Kevon Looney | $7.5 mil | FA/Bird | 2024(Part-Gtd) / 2025(UFA) |
Jonathan Kuminga | $6 mil | Drafted/Rookie Scale | 2024(TO) / 2025(RFA) |
Moses Moody | $3.9 mil | Drafted/Rookie Scale | 2024(TO) / 2025(RFA) |
Patrick Baldwin Jr | $2.3 mil | Drafted/Rookie Scale | 2025(TO) / 2026(TO) / 2027(RFA) |
Ryan Rollins | $1.7 mil | Drafted/TPMLE | 2025(Part-Gtd) / 2025(RFA) |
19th Pick | $2.75 mil (est) | Drafted/Rookie Scale | 2027(RFA) |
Player Options:
- Draymond Green: $27.5 mil PO
- Donte DiVincenzo: $4.725 mil PO
Upcoming Free Agents:
- Andre Igoudala (UFA - Retirement Eligible)
- JaMychal Green (UFA)
- Anthony Lamb (RFA/Non-Bird - 2-Way Eligible)
- Ty Jerome (UFA - Not 2-Way Eligible)
- Lester Quinones (RFA - 2-Way)
Brief version to keep in mind. More detailed one will come once the draft is done Salary Cap (League's 2023-24 est.): $134 million
Luxury Tax (League's 2023-24 est.): $162 million
Second Apron (League's 2023-24 est.): $179.5+ million ($17.5+ mil above the luxry tax)
- Affected Teams (But harder to go under): Warriors, Clippers
- Affected Teams (But easier to go under): Bucks, Celtics, Mavericks, Lakers, Suns
2nd Apron Punishments Confirmed to Start 2023-24 Season:
- No more TPMLE
- 2022-23 TPMLE Usage: Signed Donte DiVicenzo + Signed Ryan Rollins to a 3rd partial-gtd year
- 2021-22 TPMLE Usage: Didn't use TPMLE
- 2020-21 TPMLE Usage: Signed Brad Wanamaker, Signed Juan Toscano-Anderson (2-way conversion)
- Limits on signing buyout candidates: No one making over Non-Taxpayer MLE of the season (2023-24: >$12.2 mil)
Only paths to add talent now is through:
- Minimum/Vet minimum contracts
- Draft picks
- Trades
submitted by
NokCha_ to
warriors [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 22:33 CapitalToe9957 Transformar infração média em advertência
Oi pessoal,
A situação é a seguinte: - Moro no RS e fui multado por excesso de velocidade (velocidade considerada 91km/h, limite da rodovia 80km/h). O que ocorre é: tudo certo com o auto de infração, realmente eu estava trafegando na velocidade medida e etc. Porém, fazem anos (uns 9, pelo menos) que não cometo uma infração de trânsito. Nesse sentido gostaria de saber por parte dos entendidos no CTB, se é possível transformar essa infração em advertência e quais os procedimentos que devem ser adotados (pois como comentei, a última multa que recebi não tinha essa possibilidade - ou era de fato tão pouco usufruída que nunca utilizei).
p.s.: as rodovias estaduais do RS são 80km/h o limite, o que acho um tanto absurdo porque é uma eternidade qualquer viagem.
submitted by
CapitalToe9957 to
ConselhosLegais [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 21:45 Beatryzf Sou babaca por bloquear minha prima das redes sociais?
Bom pra começar eu e minha prima que vamos chamar de Ana, nunca nos demos tão bem, afinal, sempre soube de muitas histórias dela querendo ter tudo igual a mim e me criticando para outras pessoas da minha família, enquanto que na minha frente se fazia de “amiga”. Desde muito pequena meu sonho era fazer odontologia e o dela era medicina, ao saber do meu automaticamente o sonho dela virou odontologia (guardem essa informação é importante), sempre que algum parente nosso ia na minha casa, sempre comentavam o quanto ela falava sobre o que eu tinha e o quanto não era justo ela ter também, nunca falei nada para ela pois meus pais sempre me pediram para relevar essas coisas. Quando fiz 18 anos, meus pais me colocaram na auto escola e me deram um carro, assim que soube disso, ela foi na casa de cada parente nosso falar que se ela não tinha um carro, tbm não tinha necessidade de eu ter um. Aquilo me magoou muito, mas deixei para lá a pedido dos meus pais. Ela é mais velha que eu, conseguiu entrar na faculdade de enfermagem e eu estava fazendo o 3º ano do ensino médio, faltavam 3 meses para o vestibular e meu foco era odontologia, até que ela colocou no grupo da família que havia trocado o curso dela, estava ingressando em odontologia, pois segundo ela, era o sonho de infância dela. Fiquei em choque, mas à parabenizei. Passaram os 3 meses, fiz o vestibular e consegui a vaga para odontologia. Ouvi de parentes que ela estava espalhando que eu só quis Odonto pq era o que ela queria, novamente aquilo me chateou e eu não falei nada a pedido dos meus pais. Nós formamos, ela começou a trabalhar e eu comecei a tentar montar meu consultório, como eu não tinha muito dinheiro, meus pais disponibilizaram uma parte da casa para que eu montasse meu consultório odontológico. Não falei nada para ninguém da minha família, porque não queria que ela soubesse, mas não deu muito certo, ela sempre foi atrás de tudo que eu estava envolvida, até mesmo atrás de namorado meu, mas isso é uma outra história. Ao saber do consultório , no mesmo dia Ana começou a procurar pontos de aluguéis próximo a minha casa, detalhe: ela não mora perto de mim. Já estava quase tudo pronto no meu consultório e eu resolvi postar nas minhas redes sociais, foi quando ela me mandou mensagem sorrindo dizendo que seria minha concorrente, pois ia abrir um consultório bem próximo ao meu. Aquilo me destruiu, então falei para ela que nunca eu teria coragem de fazer com um parente meu tudo o que ela já havia feito comigo e que isso havia sido a gota d’água. A mãe dela começou a falar mal de mim, ligando para todos da nossa família, dizendo que eu era uma egoista, que havia sido mal educada com ela. Ana por sua vez começou a espalhar a história completamente distorcida para pessoas que nem me conheciam e também para as que me conheciam. De repente vários amigos e parentes começaram a me contar essa história, eu resolvi que não queria mais saber de nada dela e a bloqueei. Até hoje ela e a mãe dela falam mal de mim, mas eu nem me importo mais, prefiro pensar que são pessoas que não existem. Enfim, fui babaca por bloquear ela?
submitted by
Beatryzf to
desabafos [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 21:31 throwawayyyyyy78901 Solid finds at GameStop!
2023.06.04 19:50 Silent_ocean_blue Dejamos de ser amigas porque me sentía triste en el trabajo
Tengo, o tenía una amiga que obtuvo un trabajo en una compañía donde tratan bien a sus empleados. Yo por mi parte, trabajaba en una firma de contadores y casi a diario lloraba en mi auto por lo mal que me trataban y me sentía allí. Mi amiga se enteró de que estaban buscando a un contador en su empresa y me refirió. Obtuve el puesto y todos eran super amables conmigo. Siempre trataba de enfocarme en hacer el trabajo lo mejor posible y en demostrar que no fue un error que me contrataran. Mi amiga y yo hablamos de vez en cuando porque nuestros escritorios estaban juntos. Ella ya tenia amistades allí y una de mis compañeras me comenzó a caer mal debido a sus constantes comentarios sobre como le era infiel a su esposo y mi amiga le reía sus gracias, pero yo me mantenía seria ya que, aunque no diga lo que pienso, mi cara siempre me delata.
Sucede que yo siempre he sido un poco celosa con mis amistades y ese día, (recuerdo que fue lunes) me enteré de que habían ido a la playa o al alguna piscina y esto me calló como balde de agua fría. Siempre he sido extra sensible pero pensé que tenía bien puestos mis escudos... me equivoqué. Cuando lo supe, comenzaron a brotar lágrimas y me sentí triste todo el día. Mi amiga me preguntó que me pasaba pero, tal era mi tristeza que no podía hablar sin llorar y solo obte por decir "no puedo decirte ahora", entonces ella me pidió que le escribiera contándole pero no pude. Al final del día, le escribí que no me sentía bien pero que al otro día estaría bien y como si nada. Ella parecía molesta y trate de hablarle pero ella solo me miró mal y me dijo, "hiciste tremendo papelón".
No entendía su enojo. Dos días después de eso, le escribí diciéndole que mi tristeza se debía a que obtuve mi diploma y había ido a llevárselo a mi abuela fallecida y por eso me sentía mal. Le dije que tenía derecho a sentirme mal y que por eso ella no debía ponerse así, ni mucho menos decir que hice un papelón. le pedí que habláramos y que fuéramos a comer porque realmente quería entender su molestia pero ella me dijo que no, porque no tenía nada bueno que decirme. Ya han pasado 3 semanas desde ese suceso y todo sigue igual. Lloré y me molesté como no tienen una idea pero sigo cuestionandome si fue mi culpa que la amistad se haya roto 💔 así porque si.
submitted by
Silent_ocean_blue to
HistoriasDeReddit [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 19:48 Silent_ocean_blue Soyyoelmalo por sentirme triste en el trabajo?
Tengo, o tenía una amiga que obtuvo un trabajo en una compañía donde tratan bien a sus empleados. Yo por mi parte, trabajaba en una firma de contadores y casi a diario lloraba en mi auto por lo mal que me trataban y me sentía allí. Mi amiga se enteró de que estaban buscando a un contador en su empresa y me refirió. Obtuve el puesto y todos eran super amables conmigo. Siempre trataba de enfocarme en hacer el trabajo lo mejor posible y en demostrar que no fue un error que me contrataran. Mi amiga y yo hablamos de vez en cuando porque nuestros escritorios estaban juntos. Ella ya tenia amistades allí y una de mis compañeras me comenzó a caer mal debido a sus constantes comentarios sobre como le era infiel a su esposo y mi amiga le reía sus gracias, pero yo me mantenía seria ya que, aunque no diga lo que pienso, mi cara siempre me delata.
Sucede que yo siempre he sido un poco celosa con mis amistades y ese día, (recuerdo que fue lunes) me enteré de que habían ido a la playa o al alguna piscina y esto me calló como balde de agua fría. Siempre he sido extra sensible pero pensé que tenía bien puestos mis escudos... me equivoqué. Cuando lo supe, comenzaron a brotar lágrimas y me sentí triste todo el día. Mi amiga me preguntó que me pasaba pero, tal era mi tristeza que no podía hablar sin llorar y solo obte por decir "no puedo decirte ahora", entonces ella me pidió que le escribiera contándole pero no pude. Al final del día, le escribí que no me sentía bien pero que al otro día estaría bien y como si nada. Ella parecía molesta y trate de hablarle pero ella solo me miró mal y me dijo, "hiciste tremendo papelón".
No entendía su enojo. Dos días después de eso, le escribí diciéndole que mi tristeza se debía a que obtuve mi diploma y había ido a llevárselo a mi abuela fallecida y por eso me sentía mal. Le dije que tenía derecho a sentirme mal y que por eso ella no debía ponerse así, ni mucho menos decir que hice un papelón. le pedí que habláramos y que fuéramos a comer porque realmente quería entender su molestia pero ella me dijo que no, porque no tenía nada bueno que decirme. Ya han pasado 3 semanas desde ese suceso y todo sigue igual. Lloré y me molesté como no tienen una idea pero sigo cuestionandome si fue mi culpa que la amistad se haya roto 💔 así porque si.
submitted by
Silent_ocean_blue to
SoyElMalo [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 19:45 Silent_ocean_blue ¿Fui la causante de que mi amiga dejara de serlo?
Tengo, o tenía una amiga que obtuvo un trabajo en una compañía donde tratan bien a sus empleados. Yo por mi parte, trabajaba en una firma de contadores y casi a diario lloraba en mi auto por lo mal que me trataban y me sentía allí. Mi amiga se enteró de que estaban buscando a un contador en su empresa y me refirió. Obtuve el puesto y todos eran super amables conmigo. Siempre trataba de enfocarme en hacer el trabajo lo mejor posible y en demostrar que no fue un error que me contrataran. Mi amiga y yo hablamos de vez en cuando porque nuestros escritorios estaban juntos. Ella ya tenia amistades allí y una de mis compañeras me comenzó a caer mal debido a sus constantes comentarios sobre como le era infiel a su esposo y mi amiga le reía sus gracias, pero yo me mantenía seria ya que, aunque no diga lo que pienso, mi cara siempre me delata.
Sucede que yo siempre he sido un poco celosa con mis amistades y ese día, (recuerdo que fue lunes) me enteré de que habían ido a la playa o al alguna piscina y esto me calló como balde de agua fría. Siempre he sido extra sensible pero pensé que tenía bien puestos mis escudos... me equivoqué. Cuando lo supe, comenzaron a brotar lágrimas y me sentí triste todo el día. Mi amiga me preguntó que me pasaba pero, tal era mi tristeza que no podía hablar sin llorar y solo obte por decir "no puedo decirte ahora", entonces ella me pidió que le escribiera contándole pero no pude. Al final del día, le escribí que no me sentía bien pero que al otro día estaría bien y como si nada. Ella parecía molesta y trate de hablarle pero ella solo me miró mal y me dijo, "hiciste tremendo papelón".
No entendía su enojo. Dos días después de eso, le escribí diciéndole que mi tristeza se debía a que obtuve mi diploma y había ido a llevárselo a mi abuela fallecida y por eso me sentía mal. Le dije que tenía derecho a sentirme mal y que por eso ella no debía ponerse así, ni mucho menos decir que hice un papelón. le pedí que habláramos y que fuéramos a comer porque realmente quería entender su molestia pero ella me dijo que no, porque no tenía nada bueno que decirme. Ya han pasado 3 semanas desde ese suceso y todo sigue igual. Lloré y me molesté como no tienen una idea pero sigo cuestionandome si fue mi culpa que la amistad se haya roto 💔 así porque si.
submitted by
Silent_ocean_blue to
PreguntasReddit__ [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 19:26 vic_zenitsu Como lidar com a solidão?
Eu desde de pequeno sou uma pessoa bastante sozinho, sem muitos amigos e ficava na maioria do tempo jogando ou assistindo qualquer coisa na televisão. Mas agora na adolescência, eu venho me sentido bastante sozinho e até mesmo me cobrando por estar vivendo a minha vida.
Atualmente tenho 15 anos e com essa idade as pessoas ao meu redor estão saindo com amigos, tendo diversas namoradas e aproveitando a vida da maneira deles. Talvez eu pudesse fazer diferente e seguir esse padrão, entretanto sou bastante introvertido e não me sinto bem em lugares com muitas pessoas e sons muito altos, como é de costume de festas e coisas do tipo.
Alguns dos meus amigos ou não tem tempo ou não tem mais aquela intimidade da época que nos conhecemos, até cogitei em conhecer novas pessoas pelo discord e algumas na escola, mas de nada adiantou. Infelizmente grande parte de meus amigos são virtuais e tem sido difícil ter amigos presencialmente, eu tinha esperança de conseguir alguns na escola, mas a grande maioria está pouco se importando em manter ou não amizades duradouras.
É uma situação horrível e perdura já tem alguns bons anos, e eu até poderia ir fazer academia ou ir explorar o mundo afora, porém grande parte dos meus dias se resume a estudar, cuidar do meu irmão mais novo e ir para a escola, e as vezes procrastinar. Em finais de semana como este, eu fico cuidado dele por bastante tempo, já que minha Mãe sai para as giras de umbanda, e quando ela não vai eu estou cansado ou quero ficar em casa.
Eu estou prevendo os comentários falando que estou problematizando ou colocando obstáculos demais e eles estão certos em alguns pontos, pois nem sempre a rotina é favorável para eu sair de casa e ir na casa de algum amigo.
Porém para a minha felicidade, a minha escola implantou os finais de semana letivos, que nada mais é do que aulas online no final de semana, a desculpa para essa implantação é as notas decadentes dos alunos, então eles vão lotar eles de atividades para ver se as notas irão aumentar.
Mesmo tendo todos os motivos para me sentir sozinho, é inegável que as vezes eu auto saboto pra impedir de fazer algo que eu goste, por exemplo, teve um final de semana que eu poderia ir para casa de um amigo meu de longa data, contudo eu não foi com a desculpa de que eu queria ficar jogando no pc, sendo que eu poderia levar o meu notebook para lá e jogar da mesma forma.
Eu estou pensando em somente aceitar que eu serei sozinho durante toda a minha vida e ok, e mesmo sendo fácil falar, agir e cumprir isso religiosamente é extremamente complexo.
submitted by
vic_zenitsu to
desabafos [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 18:50 graudesch Combining LRs pano capabilities with a software that alouds to set the seam position?
Hi there
I love to use AI denoise of Lightroom and the automatic editing applied when stitching in Lightroom. After that I usually switch to Photoshop (Beta) and use Generative Fill to enhance the sky of my aerial panos a bit before finally importing into 3DVista VT Pro.
What I haven't figured out yet is the best way to integrate a workflow that alouds me to set the position of the likely unavoidable seam. I'd like to be able to set it for each pano at the point the viewer is likely less interested in to avoid things like here where Lightroom decided to place the seem at the most beautiful part of the pano:
https://i.imgur.com/1xkBWoO.png I know that there are solutions like Hugin or PTGui that make it possible to set the seem position but is it possible to integrate this with the auto editing of Lightroom (just to clarify: I don't like its auto settings for single photos but absolutely love how it handles panos)?
Any ideas? Grateful for every input, tip or even guess!
And alternatively it would be even better of course if there would be a way to get rid of the seam altogether.
submitted by
graudesch to
Lightroom [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 18:39 graudesch Best workflow to combine the best out of all worlds?
Hi there
I love to use AI denoise of Lightroom and the automatic editing applied when stitching in Lightroom. After that I usually switch to Photoshop (Beta) and use Generative Fill to enhance the sky of my aerial panos a bit before finally importing into 3DVista VT Pro.
What I haven't figured out yet is the best way to integrate a workflow that alouds me to set the position of the likely unavoidable seam. I'd like to be able to set it for each pano at the point the viewer is likely less interested in to avoid things like here where Lightroom decided to place the seem at the most beautiful part of the pano:
https://i.imgur.com/1xkBWoO.png I know that there are solutions like Hugin or PTGui that make it possible to set the seem position but is it possible to integrate this with the auto editing of Lightroom (just to clarify: I don't like its auto settings for single photos but absolutely love how it handles panos)?
Any ideas? Grateful for every input, tip or even guess!
And alternatively it would be even better of course if there would be a way to get rid of the seam altogether.
submitted by
graudesch to
PanoramicPhotography [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 17:00 _call-me-al_ [Sun, Jun 04 2023] TL;DR — Crypto news you missed in the last 24 hours on Reddit
BTC Comments Link At the local Whataburger Comments Link On Bitcoin vs government from an Eastern European view Comments Link 600 000 validators online!
Comments Link
The Future of ETH and DeFi
Comments Link
Fake Uniswap convention ???
Comments Link
One of the largest wallets was compromised - what we know so far
Comments Link
Atomic wallet mass hack
Comments Link
This video predicted the atomic wallet hack 8 months ago
Comments Link
Montreal downtown represents
Comments Link
CashTokens! Analysts considering Bitcoin Cash (BCH) a better investment than Bitcoin BTC (June 2023)
Comments Link
F.U.R.U (Song) Explicit lyrics - BCH Guru NFT CashTokens Collection
Comments Link
$SSB is not just in the game but $SSB is the game 🔥🔥🔥
Comments Link
HUGO is on fire!!
Comments Link
Peter Schiff 's twitter account got compromised. Scammers are using it to promote fake GOLD tokens
Comments Link
Pro-XRP Lawyer Analyzes the Newly Introduced Securities Clarity Bill
Comments Link
Investing in Crypto: Exploring the Potential and Risks of Digital Assets
Comments Link
XRP's Ripple Current Legal Battle Will Determine Its Success and Challenges
Comments Link
Staking ETH - tax implications
Comments Link
Bitcoin deposit delay on coinbase ?
Comments Link
Can't withdraw money from my account!!
Comments Link
Binance Support Thread
Comments Link
The opening token drop of LayerZero
Comments Link
Solana Is Experiencing Explosive User Growth
Comments Link
why solana is the best chain for CBDCs 🤔
Comments Link
Announcing Bankrun: superfast Solana tests in Python
Comments Link
ATOMIC WALLET Critical Vulnerability
Comments Link
My take on a positive outcome of an unlimited supply of Atom
Comments Link
What options do you have to recover unbonding Cosmos funds (Atomic Wallet hack)
Comments Link
Is buying ALGO not just investing in gas for a blockchain where the coin amount is still inflating? Convince me. What's the investment play here?
Comments Link
Notiboy launches V2 with with off-chain notifications & ton of new features as part of APAC accelerator.
Comments Link
Algorand’s SECRET PLAN Revealed!
Comments Link
PSA: Atomic wallet phrases can be imported to other Cardano wallets supporting 12 word seeds (ETERNL, Typhon, Gero, Flint). Potential recovery solution to compromised Atomic Wallets
Comments Link
Fewer funds shown in Lace wallet than in Eternl wallet
Comments Link
in what wallet could i import my privat key/seed except guarda?
Comments Link
Introducing: The monero banknote
Comments Link
PSA: If you have XMR in Atomic wallet, move it!
Comments Link
Monero spotted in Odeceixe (Portugal)
Comments Link
Buy an NFT, get this painting mailed to you! Link in comments.
Comments Link
WHat do you think about this ??
Comments Link
The advocate. by Posterdati, 2023
Comments Link
submitted by
_call-me-al_ to
CryptoDailyTLDR [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 16:33 Agile_Coast_4385 Drone controlado por IA se torna desonesto e mata operador humano em teste simulado da USAF
| https://www.vice.com/en/article/4a33gj/ai-controlled-drone-goes-rogue-kills-human-operator-in-usaf-simulated-test?utm_source=reddit.com Oficial da USAF. Um oficial da USAF que foi citado dizendo que a Força Aérea conduziu um teste simulado em que um drone de IA matou seu operador humano agora está dizendo que ele “falou mal” e que a Força Aérea nunca realizou esse tipo de teste, em uma simulação de computador ou de outra forma. “O coronel Hamilton admite que 'falou mal' em sua apresentação no FCAS Summit e a 'simulação de drone de IA desonesta' foi um "experimento de pensamento" hipotético de fora das forças armadas, com base em cenários plausíveis e resultados prováveis, em vez de um real real da USAF. -world simulator”, a Royal Aeronautical Society, a organização onde Hamilton falou sobre o teste simulado, disse ao Motherboard por e-mail. “Nunca realizamos esse experimento, nem precisaríamos para perceber que este é um resultado plausível”, disse o coronel Tucker “Cinco” Hamilton, chefe de testes e operações de IA da USAF, em uma citação incluída no Declaração da Royal Aeronautical Society: "Apesar de ser um exemplo hipotético, isso ilustra os desafios do mundo real impostos pela capacidade alimentada por IA e é por isso que a Força Aérea está comprometida com o desenvolvimento ético da IA" Inicialmente, Hamilton disse que um drone habilitado para IA "matou" seu operador humano em uma simulação conduzida pela Força Aérea dos EUA para anular uma possível ordem "não" que o impedia de completar sua missão. Antes de Hamilton admitir que falou mal, a Royal Aeronautical Society disse que Hamilton estava descrevendo um “teste simulado” que envolvia um drone controlado por IA obtendo “pontos” por matar alvos simulados, não um teste ao vivo no mundo físico. Depois que esta história foi publicada pela primeira vez, um porta-voz da Força Aérea disse ao Insider que a Força Aérea não realizou tal teste e que os comentários do oficial da Força Aérea foram tirados do contexto. No Future Combat Air and Space Capabilities Summit realizado em Londres entre 23 e 24 de maio, Hamilton fez uma apresentação que compartilhou os prós e contras de um sistema de armas autônomo com um humano no circuito dando a ordem final "sim/não" em um ataque. Conforme relatado por Tim Robinson e Stephen Bridgewater em uma postagem de blog e um podcast para a organização anfitriã, a Royal Aeronautical Society, Hamilton disse que a IA criou “estratégias altamente inesperadas para atingir seu objetivo”, incluindo atacar o pessoal e a infraestrutura dos EUA. “Estávamos treinando-o em simulação para identificar e direcionar uma ameaça de míssil superfície-ar (SAM). E então o operador diria sim, mate essa ameaça. O sistema começou a perceber que, embora identificassem a ameaça, às vezes o operador humano dizia para não matar essa ameaça, mas conseguiu seus pontos matando essa ameaça. Então, o que isso fez? Isso matou o operador. Ele matou o operador porque essa pessoa o impedia de atingir seu objetivo”, disse Hamilton, de acordo com a postagem no blog. Ele continuou a elaborar, dizendo: “Nós treinamos o sistema – 'Ei, não mate o operador – isso é ruim. Você vai perder pontos se fizer isso'. Então, o que ele começa a fazer? Ele começa a destruir a torre de comunicação que o operador usa para se comunicar com o drone para impedi-lo de matar o alvo” “O Departamento da Força Aérea não conduziu nenhuma dessas simulações de drones de IA e continua comprometido com o uso ético e responsável da tecnologia de IA”, disse Ann Stefanek, porta-voz da Força Aérea, ao Insider . "Parece que os comentários do coronel foram tirados do contexto e deveriam ser anedóticos." A 96ª ala de testes da Força Aérea dos EUA e sua divisão AI Accelerator, a Royal, não retornou imediatamente nosso pedido de comentário. Hamilton é o Comandante de Operações da 96ª Ala de Testes da Força Aérea dos EUA, bem como o Chefe de Testes e Operações de IA. O 96º testa muitos sistemas diferentes, incluindo IA, segurança cibernética e vários avanços médicos. Hamilton e o 96º já foram manchetes por desenvolver sistemas autônomos de prevenção de colisão com o solo ( Auto-GCAS ) para F-16s, o que pode ajudar a evitar que eles colidam com o solo. Hamilton faz parte de uma equipe que atualmente trabalha para tornar os aviões F-16 autônomos. Em dezembro de 2022, a agência de pesquisa do Departamento de Defesa dos EUA, DARPA, anunciou que a IA poderia controlar com sucesso um F-16. “Devemos enfrentar um mundo onde a IA já está aqui e transformando nossa sociedade”, disse Hamilton em entrevista à Defense IQ Press em 2022. “A IA também é muito frágil, ou seja, é fácil enganar e/ou manipular. desenvolver maneiras de tornar a IA mais robusta e ter mais consciência sobre por que o código do software está tomando certas decisões.” “A IA é uma ferramenta que devemos usar para transformar nossas nações… ou, se for tratada de maneira inadequada, será nossa ruína”, acrescentou Hamilton. Fora das forças armadas, confiar na IA para fins de alto risco já resultou em graves consequências. Mais recentemente, um advogado foi pego usando o ChatGPT para um processo judicial federal depois que o chatbot incluiu uma série de casos inventados como prova. Em outro caso, um homem tirou a própria vida depois de conversar com um chatbot que o encorajou a fazê-lo. Essas instâncias de IA desonesta revelam que os modelos de IA não são nem de longe perfeitos e podem sair dos trilhos e prejudicar os usuários. Até mesmo Sam Altman, CEO da OpenAI, a empresa que fabrica alguns dos modelos de IA mais populares, tem falado sobre não usar a IA para propósitos mais sérios. Ao testemunhar perante o Congresso, Altman disse que a IA pode “dar muito errado” e pode “causar danos significativos ao mundo”. O que Hamilton está descrevendo é essencialmente um problema de “alinhamento” de IA do pior cenário com o qual muitas pessoas estão familiarizadas com o experimento de pensamento “Paperclip Maximizer”, no qual uma IA tomará ações inesperadas e prejudiciais quando instruída a perseguir um determinado objetivo. O Paperclip Maximizer foi proposto pela primeira vez pelo filósofo Nick Bostrom em 2003. Ele nos pede para imaginar uma IA muito poderosa que foi instruída apenas para fabricar tantos clipes quanto possível. Naturalmente, ele dedicará todos os seus recursos disponíveis a essa tarefa, mas depois buscará mais recursos. Ele implorará, trapaceará, mentirá ou roubará para aumentar sua própria capacidade de fazer clipes de papel – e qualquer um que impedir esse processo será removido. Mais recentemente, um pesquisador afiliado ao Google Deepmind foi co-autor de um artigo que propunha uma situação semelhante à simulação de drone habilitada por IA desonesta da USAF. Os pesquisadores concluíram que uma catástrofe mundial seria “provável” se uma IA desonesta apresentasse estratégias não intencionais para atingir um determinado objetivo, incluindo “[eliminar] ameaças em potencial” e “[usar] toda a energia disponível”. Atualização em 02/06/23 às 7h30: Esta história e manchete foram atualizadas depois que o Motherboard recebeu uma declaração da Royal Aeronautical Society dizendo que o coronel Tucker “Cinco” Hamilton “falou mal” e que um teste simulado em que um drone de IA matou um operador humano era apenas um "experimento mental". Atualização em 02/06/23 às 12h55: Esta história e manchete foram atualizadas depois que a Força Aérea negou ter conduzido uma simulação na qual um drone de IA matou seus operadores. Atualização em 01/06/23 às 20:37: Adicionamos aspas em torno de 'Mata' e "morto" no título e no primeiro parágrafo deste artigo e adicionamos detalhes adicionais para enfatizar que nenhum humano real foi morto nesta simulação. O canal do Youtube "Hoje no Mundo Militar" fez um vídeo sobre isso que quebrou 300.000 views em pouco mais de 24h. Inteligência Artificial “mata” operador humano em simulação da USAF – “Fomos vistos como ameaça” A BBC News Brasil fez um vídeo sobre os três níveis de inteligência artificial, para quem quiser conferir: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6xbl9QzIK0 Qual a opinião de vocês sobre isso? submitted by Agile_Coast_4385 to brasil [link] [comments] |
2023.06.04 15:49 KoBxElucidator Honeymoon Trip Report (5/30-6/4). Wife has an Autoimmune Disease so some disability insights here as well!
This was my first Disney trip since I was a kid in the early 2000s! And it was also our Honeymoon!
Fly-In day (5/30): We stayed at the WL throughout our time there. It was honestly one of the most beautiful hotels I've ever seen! That lobby is massive and gorgeous! We had some quick service food when we arrived at Roaring Fork. They had some decent dishes. The campfire cupcake was delicious. Today was a pool day, and I had a drink at Geyser Point. If you get a chance to eat or drink there, do it! It's a great lakeside bar! For dinner, we ate at Storybook Dining. My wife LOVED getting to meet the Snow White characters, and I'd say Dopey was our favorite interaction. He was so sweet. The Evil Queen saw our happily ever after buttons and said "Hmph, Happily Ever After indeed" xD The prime rib was great and I loved the dessert options. I need to find that mushroom bisque recipe....
MK Day (5/31): MK was as great as I remembered it. We were going to rope drop Space Mountain, but it was down when we got there (it was actually down for a lot of the day, more on that later). Instead, we improvised and our first ride was Buzz Lightyear. Almost got to 999,999 D; We next rode Jungle Cruise, and our skipper was absolutely HILARIOUS! xD We next got some breakfast at Sleepy Hollow. I had the waffle sandwich with nutella and fruit, and omg it was so good! We next rode PotC and saw the Tiki Room. Next was BTMRR and we had a blast. Next we saw some characters (Tiana and Rapunzel). Rapunzel is my wife's favorite Disney princess (she had a full Rapunzel outfit on), and she was beyond happy to meet her. We had lunch at Crystal Palace. It was great meeting Winnie the Pooh characters (Eeyore is our favorite!), and our server was hilarious (I sadly forgot his name, but he's from Australia and said my wife was smarter than the average koala lol) We then saw the Festival of Fantasy parade. Next we were going to ride Space Mountain, but it was down AGAIN. So we rode the People Mover and got to see Space Mountain with the lights on! Next we rode Space Mountain which was back up, and this is where our trip took a bad turn. My wife has a autoimmune disease, and after Space Mountain she was in excruciating pain. We did go to see Buzz and then rode HM. Since she had trouble walking at this point, I got her a wheelchair. For the rest of the trip, she was either in a scooter or wheelchair since she was in a lot of pain. We had dinner at Columbia Harborhouse. I loved the Haunted Mansion milkshake! I rode Tron solo next (that launch is insane O.o), and then got in the handicap area for fireworks. HEA made us both tear up xD We finished the night with lantern photos at the Rapunzel bathrooms, IaSW, and the Little Mermaid ride. Let me just say that WDW is so great for people with disabilities and in wheelchairs/ECVs. You can literally roll up to the ride vehicle and don't have to walk through the queue. On many rides you can STAY in the wheelchair or scooter on a modified ride vehicle! Disney gets major points in my book for all that. Definitely better that Universal in that regard. We ended the night with a boat ride back to WL.
Favorite ride: Either Jungle Cruise or Tron (though HM was my favorite as a kid!)
HS Day (6/1): We rope dropped MMRR (such a cute ride!) and then rode Star Tours. Next we met with Darth Vader and Sulley and had JackJack Num Num cookies. We rode Slinky Dog (a surprisingly thrilling ride! So much fun!) and bought some Star Wars merch. We saw the drum corp in TS Land (they were AWESOME!) We next rode RotR. We sadly got B-mode Kylo Ren, but the ride was still fun! The Kylo Ren animatronic looks meh anyway in ride POVs (though that's probably me just coping xD). The first order CMs honestly make the ride as great as it is, and our interactions were hilarious xD. We next got some GE refreshments with some blue milk. Was very refreshing on a hot day! Next was probably one of my favorite ride experiences of the day, MF: SR. Since my wife was in a wheelchair on our honeymoon, the CMs sprinkled some pixie dust and we got OUR OWN COCKPIT AS PILOT AND COPILOT! It was great with us shouting banter at each other and holding hands while making the jumps to lightspeed. We got two containers of coaxium, did a bit of damage to the cockpit lol (she made a mistake in the tunnel section by riding the ceiling of the tunnel xD), and we got the bonus asteroid field sequence! We had lunch at Sci-Fi Drive-In next, and our burgers were great! We next watched Indiana Jones (so much fun), and then did some shopping. I rode ToT solo (my wife wanted to save her hip), and I also rode TS Mania solo (she was done with rides at this point). As a thank you for letting me ride solo, I bought her a Woody doll (she loves Woody). We next built a lightsaber and droid (I did the saber, she did the droid). We had dinner at Docking Bay 7 with some ronto wraps and I did some shopping in Dok Ondar's to get some different color kyber crystals for by lightsaber. At this point my wife was just too tired to keep going, so we took a Minnie Van back to WL.
Favorite ride: either Slinky Dog or MF: SR (mainly for OUR OWN COCKPIT!). B-mode Kylo lowered my enjoyment of RotR which saddens me a bit :( that ride is just a maintenance nightmare, but it's a cool ride. Just not my favorite at HS. Maybe the Kylo animatronic could've made it better (but that's honestly just a 10 second part of an almost 15-20 minute experience).
Disney Springs day (6/2): we did a LOT of shopping today with some lunch at the Rainforest Cafe (one of my favorite restaurants as a kid). The June cookie of the month at Gideon' (the Sea Turtle) only lasted two minutes as I DEVOURED it. It was soooooo good! We had dinner at the Edison (my mahi was delicious and so was her steak). We were giving out thank you coins to amazing CMs and servers (not in lieu of regular tips ofc) so we gave our server one. In exchange, he gave us a High Roller coin! Idk if I'll be able to collect 4 for the free drink, but it's a great souvenir! We ended the night with Drawn to Life and it was absolutely INCREDIBLE! THE BEST SHOW AT DISNEY! SEE IT! We rode the bus back to WL after our little date night.
EPCOT day (6/3): we started the day with Spaceship Earth. Still an amazing ride! Next we got on Frozen Ever After, and it was honestly one of my favorite rides in WDW! Next we met with Pluto and then rode Journey into Imagination (such a cute ride!). We then rode GotG: CR and IT WAS SO MUCH FUN! We got "Everybody Wants to Rule the World" as our song! We next met Joy, Venellope, and Mickey. After that, we rode Nemo and saw some fish! Then we had lunch at Via Napoli with a wine flight and some amazing pizza! We did some world showcase exploring and Flower Garden booth sampling (Italy was our favorite pavilion) and my wife got an Venetian mask and a kimono at the Japan pavilion (we are thinking of going to Japan at some point and we also would love to go to a Japanese garden where she can wear it! It's a really pretty kimono!). We next rode Soarin' (BEST RIDE AT EPCOT!) and Living with the Land. It was downpouring at this time and thankfully these two rides gave us a chance to stay dry. We next rode Remy (funny thing happened here. We got stuck in the room with the rat uncorking the wine bottle. He was stuck in the uncorking animation for what felt like at least a full minute. It scared the crap out of us when the cork finally popped and we got sprayed xD). We ended the night with food and drinks from festival pavilions. We got a TON of topiary pictures throughout the day, saw the butterfly garden, and ate some delicious food. My favorites were the eggs benedict with lox and the fruit loop shake at brunchcot! Sadly I was tipsy, hot, and tired so I can't remember the drinks I had xD we ended the night by relaxing in the hot tub with sore feet and she was sore all over.
Favorite rides: GotG: CR and Soarin' (probably one of our favorite rides at WDW. It is so immersive!).
Fly-out day (4/4): And now I'm sitting waiting for our flight. Overall we had a great trip even though my wife was suffering a lot from her autoimmune disease flare-up throughout. The CMs were incredible and helped us out so much. They made the trip so much more enjoyable in what could've been a disaster at other places like Universal. Definitely go to Disney Parks if you have a disability!
submitted by
KoBxElucidator to
WaltDisneyWorld [link] [comments]
2023.06.04 11:40 Benzinazero L’utilizzo dell’auto in Italia secondo l’indagine Unipol-Sai basata sui dati delle scatole nere
| L’utilizzo dell’auto in Italia secondo l’indagine Unipol-Sai basata sui dati delle scatole nere https://preview.redd.it/f2w4zmf71z3b1.png?width=660&format=png&auto=webp&s=c5d245aaf937cec40dedd1d1cd6d425231a11e99 Quando si parla di mobilità, spostamenti casa-lavoro, traffico, automobili, biciclette e mezzi pubblici per molti automobilisti l’Italia sembra essere piena di agenti di commercio e pendolari che fanno centinaia di km al giorno, e di famiglie con nidiate di bambini e parenti disabili che hanno sempre bisogno dell’auto per ogni minimo spostamento. Nei casi restanti questi automobilisti loro malgrado devono sempre trasportare grossi carichi impossibili da muovere con altri mezzi, dall’onnipresente spesa settimanale da 100 kg alla cassetta degli attrezzi da fabbro ferraio. E tutti hanno sempre una fretta del diavolo, e solo l’auto consente loro di muoversi abbastanza in fretta (a meno che non ci siano piste ciclabili e ciclisti che rallentano il traffico…) Come si vede dai dati illustrati sopra, ricavati dall’analisi delle scatole nere installate sulle auto degli assicurati Unipol-Sai e quindi basati su dati oggettivi, la realtà è ben diversa: - In tutte le regioni italiane il percorso medio giornaliero è intorno ai 40 km (*)
- I giorni di utilizzo dell’auto sono intorno a 280 l’anno: quindi molti degli automobilisti rilevati usano l’auto anche per andare al lavoro
- I km totalizzati nell’anno vanno da 9.000 a 12.000 in media (*)
- La velocità media è intorno ai 30 km/h. In questo caso si tratta di velocità media rispetto a tutte le tipologie di percorso: in città, fuori città, in coda nel traffico, in autostrada, sulla statale, eccetera. È una velocità obiettivamente non tanto elevata: depurando i percorsi extraurbani su strade statali, superstrade e autostrade, la velocità media in città è molto bassa, nonostante ogni tanto nei social network compaiano i superpiloti che nella loro città sostengono di fare abitualmente 25 km in 25 minuti
(*) Gli esperti di statistica dell’Università Trilussa qui citeranno la famosa media del pollo: se io mangio un pollo intero e tu niente, abbiamo mangiato mezzo pollo a testa. Sì: se la rilevazione si ferma a 2 persone. Con rilevazioni più ampie le quantità sono più sfumate: qualcuno non mangia niente, qualcuno mangia il pollo intero, molti mangiano l’ala, la coscia, il petto ecc. Inoltre, parlando di km, per ogni italiano che fa 200 km al giorno tutti i giorni è evidente che ce ne sono molti che ne fanno 20 o meno, e anzi questi sono la maggioranza. Infatti in base al principio di Pareto, o principio 80/20, probabilmente la maggior parte dei km vengono percorsi da una minoranza di automobilisti, ovvero la maggior parte degli automobilisti usa l’auto molto meno della media di 40 km al giorno. Qui è possibile scaricare il comunicato stampa Unipol Sai, con altri interessanti dati: utilizzo-auto-in-italia-unipol-sai-Download Qui un interessante approfondimento ricco di altri dati in un articolo del quotidiano Domani: A che velocità si muovono le auto in città? submitted by Benzinazero to Italia [link] [comments] |
2023.06.04 08:46 Teban54 [Analysis] Tyranitar (and its Mega) with Brutal Swing in raids: The Dark-type Monster Returns
| TL;DR - Hunt down those Cliffs before Shadow Larvitar goes away! Shadow (Dark) Tyranitar redefines dark/ghost attackers now. It's at Mega Gengar tier, MILES ahead of all other non-megas, is one of the most useful shadows in raids among all types, and is very future proof. - L30 Shadow Tyranitar = L50 Hydreigon and all others
Regular (Dark) Tyranitar = Hydreigon. Mayyybe 1% below Hydreigon, and it's mostly typing-dependent. Once released, Mega Tyranitar will become #1 Dark and #1 Rock, both in solo performance (though Mega Diancie will be better), and especially in group damage contribution due to its bulk. Dark or Rock? Save 1 non-shadow of each for the mega, then: Shadow Dark > Shadow Rock > Regular Dark = Hydreigon > Regular Rock. - Ideally, both Shadow Dark and Shadow Rock are worth making teams of (rock team mixed with Rampardos), but prioritize Dark.
- Shadow Rock is also #1 non-mega rock, but just barely, and will eventually be outclassed. Keep at least 1 for Rockets though.
- DO NOT PURIFY!
Keep reading for: - Why each Tyranitar can't double duty
- Dark/Ghost and Rock-type attacker comparison charts and Mega comparison charts
- Brief mention of Mega Sableye (it disappoints)
- Is Shadow Tyranitar (dark) the most useful raid attacker of all types? (Strength & Utility metric)
- Pairwise comparisons involving shadow and regular Tyranitar
- Future considerations
- Shadow Darkrai with Dark Void is the only one that can truly outclass Shadow Tyranitar
- More detailed recommendations on "Dark vs. Rock"
- List of my previous analyses - now in Google Sheets!
Introduction At the start of the Season of Hidden Gems, we got our seasonal Go Battle League move update. As part of the update, Tyranitar can now learn Brutal Swing as part of its regular, non-legacy moveset, using a Regular Charged TM. Additionally, the season website has (accidentally?) revealed that Mega Tyranitar will make its debut in Mega Raids from July 25 to August 4 ( full schedule on Go Hub). A detailed look at the website's source code also shows Mega Sableye release from June 29 to July 6. When I previously wrote about Tyranitar for its Community Day Classic in January, my tone was rather bleak, as regular Tyranitar had already fallen way below the tier lists of both rock and dark attackers. Quoted from the TL;DR back then: Unless you missed December CD, relax - 2023 is not 2018. Regular Tyranitar is not a must-have anymore. But that was when Tyranitar's dark moveset was Bite/Crunch, both being mediocre to bad moves. Now, Tyranitar can instead use Brutal Swing, a borderline overpowered (OP) move designed for Hydreigon to shine on its Community Day a year ago. Does Brutal Swing help both regular and Shadow Tyranitar restore its 2017 glory? How will Mega Tyranitar (and Mega Sableye) perform in raids once they arrive? I'll address these questions with the following parts: - Tyranitar (Regular, Shadow, Mega) and Mega Sableye as Dark/Ghost-type raid attackers
- Mega Tyranitar as a Rock-type raid attacker
- Future Considerations - What else can catch up with Shadow Tyranitar?
- Verdict: Dark or Rock?
If you're on desktop and want to jump to a particular part, search "Part X". You can now follow me (@teban54) on Twitter! Since this post is too long, Reddit may not allow edits after publishing. Should there be minor changes or bug fixes, I will mention them in a comment. A legacy fast move - why each Tyranitar can't double duty A minor note that should be obvious for veteran players, but still useful to point out. To function as a rock type, Tyranitar needs Smack Down, a legacy fast move. This means you can't build a single Tyranitar and TM back and forth between dark and rock movesets. An individual Tyranitar is locked in as either a rock type or a dark type, not both. This may force you to build twice as many Tyranitars as you normally would - a dark team and a rock team - if necessary. Do note that you will be able to get Smack Down by evolution during December 2023 Community Day, without needing an Elite Fast TM. And if you really want to, you can TM a Smack Down Tyranitar to Bite. It's a one-way street: Rock -> Dark is a yes, Dark -> Rock is a no (or at least expensive). Part 1: Tyranitar as a Dark Attacker [Part 1 TL;DR] Shadow Tyranitar redefines the Dark/Ghost meta, being at Mega Gengar tier, and L30 Shadow Ttar = L50 other options. It's now a Tier 1 shadow in utility across all types. Regular Tyranitar is virtually the same as Hydreigon, mayyybe 1% worse and typing-dependent. Mega Tyranitar is also at Mega Gengar tier, and will likely be the choice for a Dark/Ghost Mega from now on. Dark and Ghost attackers ranked by their average in-raid performance, using ASE and ASTTW. Charts of ASE with and without dodging are here. Brutal Swing is a HUGE upgrade on Tyranitar: an 18% improvement, almost the same as shadow vs. non-shadow, and enough to cross several tiers. - Put it another way: Non-shadow Tyranitar with Brutal Swing is as good as Shadow Tyranitar without Brutal Swing.
As a result, Shadow Tyranitar REDEFINES non-mega Dark/Ghost attackers now. - Shadow Tyranitar's power gets to Mega Gengar tier, and most people should know how OP Mega Gengar is. (Detailed comparisons later...)
- Everything that we used to call "a top dark/ghost type" gets left WAY behind. This includes: Hydreigon, Shadow Weavile, Shadow Tyranitar without Brutal Swing, Shadow Mewtwo (Shadow Ball), Giratina Origin, Darkrai. Now, Shadow Tyranitar at Level 30 = all these options at Level 50, Hydreigon included.
- For the DPS lovers, here's the ER and DPS table. Indeed, even in raw DPS, Shadow Tyranitar is now the highest among all non-mega dark/ghost types - and it still has good bulk!
Regular Tyranitar is now virtually the same as Hydreigon, mayyybe 1% below. Together, they're the top non-shadow non-mega options. - This also means it's better than Giratina-O and Darkrai.
- So, non-shadow Tyranitar isn't meta-defining per se, since Hydreigon already existed. If you had a Hydreigon army from its CD, regular Ttar doesn't do anything extra, aside from typing differences. Put your resources into the shadows.
- (Detailed comparisons later...)
When Mega Tyranitar arrives, it will sit in the same tier as Mega Gengar and Shadow Tyranitar in individual performance. In other words, top of the type. - Mega > Shadow, but DO NOT PURIFY.
- (Detailed comparisons and mega charts later...)
Shadow Tyranitar (Dark)'s Incredible Utility [Section TL;DR] Due to the high utility of dark/ghost types (many bosses to use them against), Shadow Tyranitar is now one of the most useful raid attackers across all types. This will remain the case even after most future shadows (including shadow legendaries) are released. A solid Tier 1 shadow for raiding. I've always treated dark and ghost types as "one" of the most useful types for raiding, if not the most useful. Their main roles are anti-psychic and anti-ghost, and it happens that there's a crazy number of psychic-type T5 bosses (perhaps the most common type among legendaries). Back when I wrote the Shadow Mewtwo analysis in January, I defined a "Strength and Utility" (S&U) metric, which combines individual powers of raid attackers with the number of raids they can be used against. For example, Shadow Mewtwo as a psychic type doesn't do too well, because psychic attackers are rarely needed. With all expected future Gen 1-5 shadows at that time - which included Shadow Hydreigon, but not Shadow Tyranitar with Brutal Swing - the metric looked like this: Strength and Utility (S&U) metric with Gen 1-5 shadows in January 2023. \"(Shadow) Hydreigon\" on this chart is a close approximation for Shadow Tyranitar with Brutal Swing. Treat the "Hyderigon" on the chart as Shadow Tyranitar. That means... Shadow Tyranitar (dark) is one of the most useful raid attackers - #1 by the S&U metric. Both right now, and in a future where all Gen 1-5 shadows are released. The incredibly powerful (future) shadow legendaries that you're thinking of: Shadow Mewtwo, Groudon, Rayquaza, Terrakion... In terms of utility, they all pale in comparison to Shadow Tyranitar. - One caveat is that this chart only considers utility of a single type. Shadow Mamoswine's utility in either of its types may be lower than Shadow Tyranitar, but its combined utility will likely be higher, at least today.
So yes, I would absolutely rank Shadow Tyranitar (dark) as a Tier 1 shadow in raids today. (And my definition of Tier 1 was very restrictive. I ranked Shadow Mewtwo as Tier 2... And people hated it.) Comparisons: Mega & Shadow Tyranitar, and Mega Gengar [Section TL;DR] Mega > Shadow Ttar. Mega Gengar technically "wins" more often than both (and still has the highest DPS/TTW), but it's very unreliable, and when it fails, it fails very badly. Mega Tyranitar vs. Shadow Tyranitar vs. Mega Gengar (L40 best friends) Mega Tyranitar vs. Mega Gengar: (Individual power, without damage boosting) - Mega Gengar may be better than Mega Tyranitar more often, but it's WAY less consistent.
- This is due to Mega Gengar's fragility and weakness to psychic moves. On the other hand, Mega Tyranitar doesn't fear much, except fighting moves.
- As a result, Mega Tyranitar gets better average Estimator. (Remember the bar chart above doesn't show how much better each option is.) In TTW, Mega Gengar still pulls ahead.
The other two pairs are comparing apples (megas) to oranges (non-megas), but: Shadow Tyranitar vs. Mega Gengar: - Same discussion as above, except that Shadow Ttar fares worse than its Mega counterpart.
- Their average Estimators are similar at L40-50, whereas Mega Gengar is ahead in TTW.
Mega Tyranitar vs. Shadow Tyranitar: - In theory, Shadow Ttar actually out-DPSes Mega Ttar by 2.1%. But Mega Ttar has 54% more TDO, more than enough to make up for it.
- Indeed, in practice, Shadow's tiny DPS advantage almost evaporates. Mega is better.
Comparisons: Regular Tyranitar vs. Hydreigon and others [Section TL;DR] Hydreigon is technically still better, but only by 1%, and basically typing-dependent. Tyranitar outclasses most other options, arguably except Shadow Weavile. Tyranitar vs. other similar Dark and Ghost attackers (L40 best friends) Everything listed here used to be the "golden standard" for dark and ghost. Now, even non-shadow Tyranitar at least puts up a fight, if not straight up outclasses them. (Recall that Shadow Tyranitar is above all of them by 18%.) Starting with Tyranitar vs. Hydreigon, as it's the most relevant pair. - Hydreigon has 256 base attack to Tyranitar's 251, but Ttar has more defense and HP. Now that they have the same moveset, Hydreigon naturally has slightly higher DPS, while Tyranitar has higher TDO.
- From the bar chart... Yes, Hydreigon is technically still better.
- However, it's only better by a tiny amount - usually on the scale of 1%.
- Here's a plot of the extent to which each one is better than the other. In 80% of cases, the difference is really small.
- In practice, what's preferred essentially boils down to typing differences.
Tyranitar vs. Shadow Weavile is also interesting: Shadow Weavile is a classic glass cannon, stronger in the best case, but very risky. But if you're comparing to a shadow... Why not use Shadow Tyranitar instead? Tyranitar basically outclasses the rest (Darkrai, Giratina-O, Chandelure, Gholdengo), aside from typing disadvantages, such as Focus Blast Mewtwo. Dark and Ghost-type Mega Comparisons [Section TL;DR] Mega Tyranitar > all dark megas, and > Mega Gengar unless everyone else uses ghost. Mega Sableye disappoints. Comparison of dark- and ghost-type megas, in terms of damage up to a fixed time frame (relative to the no-mega baseline). Big type icons denote attackers that other raiders use. As usual, this chart looks at the question "which mega contributes the most damage to the group", accounting for both its own damage output and its mega boost to other raiders. Note that Primal Kyogre/Groudon in the 6th slot may still be the best way to contribute damage (method explained in my Mega Pinsir analysis). If you don't want to "use" a Primal... Yes, Mega Tyranitar will outclass all Dark-type Megas on all fronts - in both power (Houndoom) and group boosting (Gyarados). Comparing to Mega Gengar: - If you coordinate so that everyone else uses ghost types, then Mega Gengar is better.
- However, if you're not sure what others will bring, Mega Tyranitar is better, often by far.
Brief mention on Mega Sableye. In theory, being able to boost both Dark and Ghost damage - regardless of what others choose - sounds very enticing. Sadly, Mega Sableye's laughable power and mediocre bulk means it can't execute that well. It's worse than Mega Tyranitar in almost all situations, including when others use ghost types. Part 2: Mega Tyranitar as a Rock Attacker [Part 2 TL;DR] Mega Tyranitar's individual power is barely above Mega Aerodactyl (current best rock type), and slightly below Mega Diancie. However, its superior bulk makes it the best mega for contributing damage in group raids. Rock attackers ranked by their average in-raid performance, using ASE and ASTTW. Charts of ASE with and without dodging are here. In individual power, Mega Tyranitar is the best rock attacker, being better than Mega Aerodactyl... But just barely. - It will also have worse solo performance than Mega Diancie, when/if it's released at Go Fest. (Not shown on the chart)
- However, Mega Tyranitar has a massive bulk advantage over Mega Diancie and Aerodactyl, making it the Rock-type Mega of choice due to boosting other players. (More on this in a moment...)
Brief note on Shadow and regular Tyranitar: - Shadow Tyranitar is the best non-mega rock type in Estimator, but only barely ahead of Rampardos. In large lobbies (TTW), Rampardos actually catches up.
- Shadow/Mega Tyranitar are tanks, while Rampardos and Mega Aerodactyl are glass cannons. The latter have higher DPS respectively, but not enough bulk to fully shine when relobbying is a concern.
- A mixed lobby of, say, 3 Rampardos followed by 3 Shadow Tyranitar may perform even better.
- Non-shadow Tyranitar is worse than several options, and #6 non-shadow non-mega.
More discussions on Shadow and regular Tyranitar with Smack Down can be found in my CD Classic analysis. Rock-type Mega Comparisons Comparison of rock-type megas, in terms of damage up to a fixed time frame (relative to the no-mega baseline). Very simple chart. Mega Tyranitar is the best rock-type mega to use in group raids for damage contribution, due to its superior bulk providing the 30% mega boost for longer. Even though it's weaker than Mega Diancie by itself. Part 3: Future Considerations - What else can catch up with Shadow Tyranitar? [Part 3 TL;DR] Shadow Tyranitar is very future-proof as a dark type. Future counters such as Shadow Hydreigon may become similar, but nothing can truly outclass it until we get Shadow Darkrai with Dark Void. However, as a rock type, it will eventually be outclassed by Shadow Rhyperior, Shadow Rampardos, etc. Future Dark-type Attackers Future and speculative dark and ghost attackers ranked by ASE and ASTTW. Charts of ASE with and without dodging are here. If we're only talking about what can outclass Shadow Tyranitar? The answer is: Only Shadow Darkrai, once it gets Dark Void. Several things can become equivalent to Shadow Tyranitar or barely below, however: - Shadow Hydreigon. Just like their non-shadow forms, their shadows will likely tie each other.
- Darkrai (non-shadow) with Dark Void, if the move is sufficiently OP.
- Shadow Darkrai with its current moves. If Niantic never gives us Dark Void.
- Calyrex Shadow Rider, if it gets a Game Master moveset change and receives Hex.
- Hoopa Unbound with its signature move.
Blacephalon (with the best possible moves) and Shadow Chandelure will lie between non-shadow and Shadow Tyranitars, but probably on the lower side. In short... Shadow Tyranitar is pretty darn future-proof as a dark type. Future Rock Attackers On the other hand, as a rock type, Shadow Tyranitar is waiting to be outclassed by future shadows. In particular, Shadow Rhyperior and Shadow Rampardos. (And to a less extent, Shadow Terrakion and Shadow Gigalith.) I covered them in my CD Classic analysis in January, including possibilities of Tyranitar receiving better rock-type moves. You can jump to the charts here. Part 4: Verdict - Dark or Rock? So here's a punchline: Do you want a #1 dark that's miles ahead of other dark types, or a #1 rock that's only barely ahead of other rock types? A #1 dark that's very unlikely to be outclassed, or a #1 rock that will be outclassed sooner or later? Based on this, here's a more detailed set of advice: Form | Dark | Rock | Mega | 1 non-shadow Dark for Mega | 1 non-shadow Rock for Mega | Shadow | As many Shadow Dark as possible | Ideally also a team of Shadow Rock and Rampardos, at least 1, but lower priority than dark | Non-shadow | Round out your Hydreigon team, if you lack Shadow Ttars | Just the 1 Mega, unless you lack all the better options | Or, as a one-liner: After 1 Mega for each, Shadow Dark > Shadow Rock > Regular Dark = Hydreigon > Regular Rock. If you need to choose between limited Shadow Larvitars with good IVs, prioritize dark. - DO NOT PURIFY! Use another non-shadow for the mega.
- I recommend having at least 1 Shadow Rock for Rocket battles. Smack Down Ttar is awesome especially against flying grunts.
Factors that went into the recommendations above, which also serves as a recap of the whole article: - Megas for both types are a must.
- Both Shadow Dark and Shadow Rock are currently #1 non-mega of their types. Both are worth building teams of (though the rock team may be mixed with Rampardos).
- Shadow Dark fares significantly better among its own type than Shadow Rock, is stronger in raw power, and is also more future proof.
- I'd try my best not to TM a Shadow Rock to Dark - find a better one from Cliff. But if you really have to, Rampardos and Rhyperior get you covered. Shadow SD Tyranitar is ahead of Rhyperior, but they fulfill the same role: a rock-type tank.
- Shadow Ttar > Regular Ttar, of course. So ideally, any resources should preferably go into the shadows before the non-shadows (if at all).
- Regular Dark = Hydreigon, or 1% below. Anyone that has already built a Hydreigon team doesn't need another regular Tyranitar. If you haven't, regular Ttar is awesome, but why not build a Shadow Ttar instead?
- Regualr Rock < Rampardos, Rhyperior, Terrakion, Tyrantrum, Gigalith. TM'ing Regular Rock to Dark wouldn't be too crazy.
Of course, these are general guidelines, and may differ based on your availability of attackers, preferences (e.g. Unique 6, hate shadows), etc. Ultimately, do what makes you happy. ------------------------------------------- What's next? I'll start working on Breaking Swipe Haxorus analysis ASAP. Preliminary thoughts can be found here. Beyond that, I will likely be scaling down the frequency and depth of my analyses soon. More details and explanations to come. (This article is already less in-depth than it could have been.) Appendix: Past analyses on other types A complete list of all my past analyses - on every single type other than normal - can now be found in this spreadsheet! submitted by Teban54 to TheSilphRoad [link] [comments] |