Jefferson county tn court docket

The Superior Court of San Diego is the trial court with general jurisdiction over both civil and criminal cases in San Diego County, California.
The Superior Court of San Diego is divided into several divisions, including:
Civil Division: Handles civil cases, such as personal injury claims, contract disputes, and property disputes.
Criminal Division: Handles criminal cases, such as felony and misdemeanor offenses, and juvenile delinquency cases.
Family Law Division: Handles family law cases, such as divorce, child custody, and child support.
Probate Division: Handles probate and estate cases, such as wills, trusts, and guardianships.
Small Claims Division: Handles small claims cases involving disputes over amounts less than $10,000.
If you need to file a case or have a legal matter that requires the attention of the Superior Court of San Diego, you can find more information on their website or by contacting the court directly.

https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/march-27-2023
Seven people died today in a school shooting in Nashville. Three of them were nine-year-olds. Three were staffers. One was the shooter. In the aftermath of the shooting, President Joe Biden once again urged Congress to pass a ban on assault weapons, to which today’s Republican lawmakers will never agree because gun ownership has become a key element of social identity for their supporters, who resent the idea that the legal system could regulate their ownership of firearms.
In the wake of the shooting, Representative Andrew Ogles (R-TN), who represents Nashville thanks to redistricting by the Republican legislature that cut up a Democratic district, said he was “utterly heartbroken” by the shooting and offered “thoughts and prayers to the families of those lost.”
In 2021, Ogles, his wife, and two of his three children held guns as they posed for a Christmas card with a caption that read: “The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference—they deserve a place of honor with all that’s good.”
Meanwhile, protests continue in Israel, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s attempt to hamstring his country’s Supreme Court and put the legislature in charge of judicial review has sparked fierce opposition.
Netanyahu regained power last November while he was facing criminal charges of fraud, breach of trust, and bribery. His far-right coalition put together a government and elevated two critics of the Israeli judiciary, who promptly put forward a plan of “legal reforms.”
According to Amichai Cohen and Yuval Shany in Lawfare, supporters of those changes claim that unelected judges who are part of a “liberal deep state” have too much power, often using it to pursue criminal proceedings against senior politicians, prohibit Israeli settlements on Palestinian land in the West Bank, or to refuse religious exemptions from military service for ultra-Orthodox yeshiva students.
On January 4, 2023, Netanyahu’s minister of justice Yariv Levin proposed an overhaul of the judicial system that would put Netanyahu’s slim majority—just 64 seats in the 120-member Knesset—in complete control of the country’s laws, enabling the far-right majority to avoid any checks on its power (as well as enabling Netanyahu to evade the criminal trials he faces).
But Netanyahu did not campaign on remaking the judiciary; it is the far-right members of his coalition who have made it their signature issue. Protests against the measures began almost immediately as alarmed Israelis realized the move would destroy their democracy.
The protests continued until this Saturday, when Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant warned that the massive backlash against the judicial overhaul, including more and more military members who are boycotting their training missions, threatened the nation’s military readiness. He called for a halt to the attempt to force through the changes. Two members of the coalition backed Gallant and one appeared to be wavering, thus threatening Netanyahu’s majority. The next day, Netanyahu fired Gallant.
The firing sparked massive demonstrations and widespread strikes. At first, the far-right members of Netanyahu’s coalition refused to stop their plans to overhaul the judiciary and called for their supporters to turn out to oppose the protesters, but Netanyahu apparently cut a deal with them. He has announced that the judicial reforms will be postponed while the two sides look for a compromise, and that he has agreed to the formation of a civil “national guard” the right will control. While Bethan McKernan of The Guardian called this move an empty gesture, Zach Beauchamp of Vox noted that the new paramilitary unit will be under the control of the extremist minister of national security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, who in 2008 was convicted of supporting a terrorist organization and who used to keep a photograph of a mass murderer in his living room.
Still, as Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo notes, the halt is “pretty transparently a stalling tactic,” launched in the hope that the protests will die down and the package can go forward later, although, as Marshall points out, polls show that the so-called reforms are very unpopular.
The crisis in Israel threatens the country’s relationship with the United States. During the Trump administration, Netanyahu cozied up to Trump and his Republican allies, and Israel’s continued rightward shift has alarmed foreign observers. In early March, Israel’s finance minister Bezalel Smotrich called for the state to “erase” a Palestinian town, and he has called himself a “proud homophobe” and a “fascist.” In Israel, Netanyahu’s son tweeted that the U.S. State Department is behind the protests, hoping to overthrow Netanyahu, a sentiment to which Netanyahu himself has nodded.
When Smotrich visited Washington, D.C., earlier this month, White House officials declined to meet with him, and more than ninety Democratic lawmakers wrote to Biden asking him to use “all diplomatic tools available to prevent Israel’s current government from further damaging the nation’s democratic institutions and undermining the potential for two states for two peoples.” According to Josh Lederman of NBC News, more than 300 rabbis last year said that members of Netanyahu’s coalition were not welcome to speak at their synagogues.
The threats to the Israeli judiciary threaten the nation’s economy, as billionaire and former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg pointed out in a New York Times op-ed earlier this month. “Companies and investors place enormous value on strong and independent judicial systems because courts help protect them — not only against crime and corruption but also government overreach. Just as important, they protect what their employees value most: individual rights and freedoms,” he wrote.
In case anyone missed the obvious comparison between what is happening in Israel and what might transpire in the U.S., Bloomberg continued: “In the United States, our founding fathers’ insistence on checks and balances to control the tyrannical tendencies of majorities was part of their genius. Our Constitution is not perfect—no law is—but its many checks and balances have been essential to protecting and advancing fundamental rights and maintaining national stability. It was only through those safeguards that the United States has managed to withstand extreme shocks to our democracy in recent years—including a disgraceful attempt to prevent the peaceful transfer of power—without a catastrophic fracturing.”

EDIT: Never mind I found the divorce :) Despite having my search set to “all party types” it wasn’t showing under my person’s name, it only came up after I searched the ex’s name which took me awhile to find on the internet
I have been using the Massachusetts Trial Court Electronic Case Access site. This individual would have been divorced prior to 2007 because they re-married that year. While I can find record for every single other divorce I know of for the county in question, I cannot find a court record for this particular divorce.
I can locate this person in other court cases, where their name is always displayed as "Arthur C Clarke" (fake example) with the middle initial included. I did find a divorce record for several years later than they should have been divorced, however the name is shown as just "Arthur Clarke" so I'm not sure if this inconsistency could exist across court records or if it's just someone else. I also checked the Probate and Family Court for all the other counties just in case the spouse had relocated.
My questions would be: 1) Could this divorce court case just not exist on the site where I can find all the other divorces I know of? Or B) Would it be even remotely possible for this person not to have formally divorced their ex until several years after their new marriage (assuming the case with the missing middle initial is indeed this person)?

[FL] Guardian At Litem
I’m taking my ex back to court for more custody. Pasco County, FL. She contsantly breaks the parenting agreement and she has not been a good Mom to our two daughters that are 8 and 10. They are starting to resent her, she is an alcoholic, she misses practices, performances, she talks terribly about me…lets just say she has many issues. Currently we have shared custody which is 65% to her and 35% to me. The main difference is Sunday nights on my weekends the kids go back with her, or they are supposed to, for months she just lets them stay with me and says she has to work. So it is basically 50/50 now, but my girls need, want and deserve to be with me more. That’s besides the point, the other day we had a hearing for a GAL. The opposing attorney objected to the GAL and then when the Guardian was assigned, he would not allow the guardian to use hearsay. Meaning the Guardian can’t use what the girls tell them. The judge stated “I can’t require you to allow Hearsay” gave a small explanation and asked the opposing Atty if he was sure he didn’t want to allow it. the Attorney said he reserved his right to allow it later, but not now.
That is very confusing to me and it brings up numerous issues. I get the guardian can still work around and find plenty out. But having the opposing Atty oppose hearsay from the kids, wouldn’t that be a huge red flag on Day one to the Judge and GAL? Clearly my ex doesn’t want the girls to be heard, she doesn’t want her truths to come out. But I would think it could piss some GAL’s off, some may not take the case, and wouldn’t that make the GAL more curious as to what she may be hiding?
Also in same hearing, my Atty asked to subpoena her work records for various reasons, but she didn’t have a concrete argument to get the Drug/ Alcohol screenings from work and the judge denied that portion of the subpoena. Wouldn’t’t that be a red flag to the judge as well. I’m more concerned about the GAL, but wanted to hear some thoughts and opinions.

I’m taking my ex back to court for more custody. Pasco County, FL. She contsantly breaks the parenting agreement and she has not been a good Mom to our two daughters that are 8 and 10. They are starting to resent her, she is an alcoholic, she misses practices, performances, she talks terribly about me…lets just say she has many issues. Currently we have shared custody which is 65% to her and 35% to me. The main difference is Sunday nights on my weekends the kids go back with her, or they are supposed to, for months she just lets them stay with me and says she has to work. So it is basically 50/50 now, but my girls need, want and deserve to be with me more. That’s besides the point, the other day we had a hearing for a GAL. The opposing attorney objected to the GAL and then when the Guardian was assigned, he would not allow the guardian to use hearsay. Meaning the Guardian can’t use what the girls tell them. The judge stated “I can’t require you to allow Hearsay” gave a small explanation and asked the opposing Atty if he was sure he didn’t want to allow it. the Attorney said he reserved his right to allow it later, but not now.
That is very confusing to me and it brings up numerous issues. I get the guardian can still work around and find plenty out. But having the opposing Atty oppose hearsay from the kids, wouldn’t that be a huge red flag on Day one to the Judge and GAL? Clearly my ex doesn’t want the girls to be heard, she doesn’t want her truths to come out. But I would think it could piss some GAL’s off, some may not take the case, and wouldn’t that make the GAL more curious as to what she may be hiding?
Also in same hearing, my Atty asked to subpoena her work records for various reasons, but she didn’t have a concrete argument to get the Drug/ Alcohol screenings from work and the judge denied that portion of the subpoena. Wouldn’t’t that be a red flag to the judge as well. I’m more concerned about the GAL, but wanted to hear some thoughts and opinions.

Okay. Sorry in advance for the length. So I'm escaping my abuser. I filed for divorce requesting only what we had agreed on re:property and finances with the sole exception that it's a divorce and not an annulment. He wants an annulment so he can turn around and sue me for "damages" from his claim that the marriage was somehow under "false pretenses" (it wasn't. I have no clue where he's getting this) and use the state granting the annulment as proof that he's a victim entitled to damages.
The reality is he's trying to use me to cover the $11,000 in credit card debt he somehow accrued behind my back during the marriage. He was trying to threaten and strong arm me into accepting an annulment without telling me why but one of his friends spilled the beans on his lawsuit plan when also trying to threaten me into giving my husband all the property he wants out of the house (including all community property) without question
Because I filed for divorce, he went through on his threats to dump half his debts on me under Arizona community property laws, take my motorcycle (my only transportation. He doesn't have a motorcycle license. This is purely out of spite), withdraw the offer to pay my moving costs back to where I lived before he brought me out here (on his dime, by his choice), and some other petty stuff that's not really legally relevant (going back on previously settled and documented agreements re: property). To be clear: this hasn't taken effect yet. It's his response to my divorce petition. But it's him punishing me, and I can even show texts where he threatened he do this if I didn't obey him, submit to an annulment, and even write down exactly what he told me to in response to whatever annulment he chooses to serve me with
Here's the thing though. Among the other types of abuse, he was also financially abusive. We were married for a bit over a year. I didn't get to work except online where I made a bit over $2k last year. He made $100k. I was only given an allowance of $85 every 2 weeks and constantly told it was my fault we were poor, we didn't have more, we supposedly struggled to pay bills, etc. I had no idea how much he was making until I did our taxes in February and I DAMN sure didn't know about this debt he was hiding until he let it slip while trying to blame me for that too. His lawsuit threat is for $15k of "damages" which he claims is everything he's spent on me....allowance, half of rent and utilities, health insurance, food (though I was also expected to feed myself + cover personal needs with that $85), medication and doctor copays (he knew I was disabled before we even dated), etc. Literally all human needs from the date of our wedding, he's planning to claim as damages because he thinks that taking care of his wife when he agreed to do so prior to marriage and made $98k more than her is somehow an injustice
But $15k plus half his debts is only (rounding up) $21,000. Under community property laws, I'm entitled to 50% of house hold earnings. And, of course, he's not wanting to split that. Just his debts. The remainer of my half would be $29,000.
Is it possible for me to tell the court I would be happy to accept half of his debt provided I am also entitled to the remainder of my half of the earnings? Because this man kept me in enforced poverty. I have nothing and when he takes the motorcycle, I wont even be able to work. And I was just accepted to university (I'm trying to get a degree so I can have a career and not get trapped into financial abuse again) and I require a student visa to go as it is in the UK....he also had his friend threaten that, if I didnt do what I was told and give him what I was told, he would essentially bury me in so much debt via lawsuit that I wouldn't get a visa or student loans. This is nothing more than punishing me for leaving him and for telling people he's abusing me.
What do I do? Is it possible to respond to his response telling the court I'm happy to accept all of my half of the community property and that I'm even willing to give him all the non cash community property as a kindness? (A television and gaming computer worth combined $3k and even the motorcycle if it means me getting out of here and not financially ruined)
(Please do not tell me to get a lawyer. I can't afford one. I would love one but I don't have the money. I have called every single legal aid group in my county and all have rejected me without even telling me why. I couldn't get so much as a consult. Law offices aren't calling me back either. I would LOVE a lawyer. But none of my efforts are paying off.)

Cross posted from another sub. I am in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
I don't know what to do. My divorce was filed in the middle of last year. We attempted to settle but opposing party gave an ultimatum and wouldn't accept anything besides a gigantic sum of cash that even if I could pay it, would be grossly unfair: the marriage lasted less than the time we've been in divorce proceedings. It was only a few months. They were asking the equivalent of about 4 months of my take home salary, which is longer than the total amount of time we were even married.
They're asking for alimony and splitting all assets personally acquired prior to marriage, as well as attorney fees. No one in the court system is moving our case onto the docket. I've asked my lawyer repeatedly to see what they can do and the response is always the same: the court is backed up due to changes from covid. Is this normal for other people? Is it normal to wait almost a year before even getting a preliminary hearing when the other spouse refuses to settle out of court in good faith?
Under normal circumstances, and given that we both have high paying jobs (we each on our own make more than double the household salary in Pittsburgh, which means together we made more than 4 times the median household salary) during and after the marriage, and given the short duration, and given that I was paying for all the housing and utility bills, and the vast majority of all other household bills, we should normally (in a sane world) split up our personal assets and move out and go on our separate ways. I should keep my personal property and they keep theirs. This is what my attorney has advised a judge will grant, especially for such a short marriage, and that there would absolutely be no alimony for a marriage lasting only a few months.
We did not purchase any property while married (again, the marriage was only a few months in duration) so there is no marital property. But spouse wants "their share" of my retirement accounts, my house (purchased over a decade before the marriage in my name only) , car (purchased 5 years before the marriage and fully paid off before marriage, also in my name only), etc. even though the spouse has over $100k in assets themselves that I am asking for no part of. Not to mention, about a quarter of that 100k were accumulated during the marriage by being able to save when I was spending my entire paycheck. Spouse's lawyer has somehow convinced them that marriage even for a few months entitles you to half of everything and they are being very aggressive going after all my premarital assets.
How do I finally get a hearing? It's been 10 months now and still no movement in the courts. It's driving me insane. I want to be done with this nightmare. Who do I talk to or where do I go to get the court to please just give me a court date so I can show the judge all the financial and legal documents concerning property ownership and financial assets so that they can rule fairly and end this nightmare? I'm begging, anyone who can help please help me. I'm lost.
On top of the nightmare of being abandoned by the person I loved more than anyone in the world, dealing with this has completely ground my life to a halt. I cannot move forward until my spouse's decision to divorce sees its end by being completed, but even they are not trying to help move it along and they're dragging their feet at any correspondences my lawyer sends for discovery and to get documents to the court in a timely manner.
Edit: I cannot get re-married, and I'm barred from participating in certain financial transactions until this divorce is finalized. It has completely destroyed my dream of starting a real estate development business as the contracts I need to enter to do so require signatures from my "spouse". How long does the court expect me to live a half-life in this way where I cannot conduct business or remarry?
Edit2: I really want to purchase real estate, but every mortgage broker I've talked to seems to be under the assumption that my divorce should be finalized by the time we close. They are unaware that, when I told them I'm in the middle of a divorce, that it's been 10 months without even getting a single hearing date assigned by the court. I actually had to kill a deal to purchase a house after receiving the counter offer because I was told by mortgage company that my spouse is legally required to sign the deed, which they will not do. Am I just screwed here for years on end because my spouse is dragging their feet on finishing what they started (the whole divorce process to begin with was their idea -- I was the abandoned spouse)? How is it fair that I cannot move on with my life and buy property to move away or to work on my real estate business because of the stubbornness of my spouse and the inability of the court to hear cases?

so i am on probation in MI for a owvi and was wondering if anyone else was allowed to use marijuana on probation. I did give my med card and physician letter to my PO and he’s giving it to the judge to make the final decision. Just curious to see everyone else’s experience with this. I’m in kent county (63rd court) if it matters. Thanks in advance!

Okay, so i’m on probation for a owvi in kent county (63rd district court) and was wondering if anyone was allowed to use their med card while on probation. I gave a copy of my med card plus a physicians letter to my PO, so now i’m just waiting on the judge to either accept of deny it. Curious to hear other’s experiences. Smolenski was my judge, si im 50/50 on it lol. Any feedback is appreciated!

Hey all Due to my poor memory, im looking for advice from more experienced individuals before i go down the rabbit hole that is the county and medical records. All help is appreciated. Almost 3-years ago, during peak covid, i was in a dark place mentally. After being stuck at home and furloughed from work i got quite depressed, lethargic and just started drinking my days away. Not only was this a bummer but it also put a good bit of strain on my marriage and caused my wife a good bit of worry for my mental state. One day i took to drinking in the bathroom before a shower, i ended up blacking out in the tub, fully clothed with the water running and flooded the whole room. Upon finding the door locked, my wife freaked and called the police before breaking down the door. Cops showed up and i came to but they insisted on the ambulance transporting me to a local hospital, and i went willingly. Once i got there, my wife came and told me that she petitoned a magistrate for a 72hr hold on me to evaluate my mental state. I broke down, agreed and met with some psych specialists to talk about how i was feeling. Although i wasnt suicidal at all, i agreed to some inpatient care and was transported, via cruiser, to a facility where i stayed for a week. Looking back, it was great for me, i pulled out of my rut and stayed sober but the whole process was a whirlwind with fuzzy details. My question is, was i involuntarily committed? I never saw a judge or dealt with any legalese papers. There was no court date or anyone forcing me to go anywhere and i was released via my therapist at the facility. Im wanting to buy a firearm for hunting but im wondering if i will be denied due to this visit. I have no felony convictions but when i was transported from the hospital, i was cuffed in the front. I dunno if any of this is considered more voluntary than involuntary but i never had a day in court or anyone telling me that i lost my rights. I also cant find much paperwork on this, although i have since moved towns and might have misplaced some. I know i can just apply to find out but id like to know more before hand to spare my nerves. I also would like to not lie on a government form if i can help it. Just looking for some insight from those with more experience and knowledge. All info is appreciated, thanks in advance!

I’m never too sure how to post updates for all those who commented to see. I know Everyone had been asking for an update, so here goes! If you’re new to the situation, please see my last post from yesterday!
for those who don’t know , my mom was pulled over for a traffic violation and used my identity to prevent herself from going to jail 3 months ago. She used my identity and signed my name for the ticket. I was never made aware and received a letter about the impending suspension of my license for not appearing to court. She never admitted it despite my extreme worry and confusion over it. **
I went to the police station today and spoke to a very kind officer who helped me file a police report. He asked all the necessary questions and said that it’s very much considered “criminal impersonation”. And that I can press charges against her. Since she has a warrant already from the county , it would make the whole process easier. Unfortunately I had therapy and had to cut the visit short and a little while later the officer called me to update me and let me know that he was working on filing it and speaking to the officer who pulled her over that night . Maybe 20 minutes later my dad calls to let me know that she’s banging on the door of his house and so I take the opportunity to call the officer and make him aware that she’s at my house. Within 6 minutes they arrive there, and begin to arrest her for the warrant . The officer walks up to her and says “you have pending charges against you for identity theft. Did you drive that car and use your daughters information?” She admitted it.
And the officer says , “why would you do that to your own daughter?” Which honestly made me wanna high five the guy. So they took her away to jail. And I FEEL SO RELIEVED!!!!!
However, I do plan to try filing a restraining order against her in the meantime.!
Thank you all for your wonderful comments and I appreciate the kind words!!!

On the evening of Tuesday, June 16, 2020 the small quiet town of Sumner, Wisconsin erupted with fast and furious chaos. Sheriff’s deputies responded to a scene where they quickly found one dead body and were met with gunfire in an ambush style attack. Kevin Anderson is a 64 year old, white male with blue eyes and balding brown hair. He is 6 feet tall and approximately 200 pounds. Anderson is being sought by multiple law enforcement agencies for charges of murder, attempted murder, arson and illegal firearms charges. Don’t not approach. Kevin Anderson is extremely dangerous and is most likely armed at all times. His picture is available on Twitter. You can follow the show @TrueCrimeGarage & @TCGNIC. If you have seen or you believe you may know the whereabouts of Kevin Anderson immediately contact one of the following - The Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office 1-920-674-7310 / The US Marshals 1-877-926-8332 / We Tip 1-800-78-CRIME
Beer of the Week - The 50 Million Dollar Man by Three Floyd’s Brewing
Garage Grade - 4 out of 5 Bottle Caps
Recommended Reading - No Mercy by John Walsh."